The Stacks project

15.128 Big projective modules are free

In this section we discuss one of the results of [Bass]; we suggest the reader look at the original paper. Our argument will use the slightly simplified proof given in the papers [Akasaki] and [Hinohara].

Proof.

\[ F \cong F \oplus F \oplus \ldots \cong P \oplus Q \oplus P \oplus Q \oplus \ldots \cong P \oplus F \oplus F \oplus \ldots \cong P \oplus F \]
$\square$

Lemma 15.128.2. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $P$ be a projective module. There exists a free module $F$ such that $P \oplus F$ is free.

Proof. Since $P$ is projective we see that $F_0 = P \oplus Q$ is a free module for some module $Q$. Set $F = \bigoplus _{n \geq 1} F_0$. Then $P \oplus F \cong F$ by Lemma 15.128.1. $\square$

Lemma 15.128.3. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $P$ be a projective module. Let $s \in P$. There exists a finite free module $F$ and a finite free direct summand $K \subset F \oplus P$ with $(0, s) \in K$.

Proof. By Lemma 15.128.2 we can find a (possibly infinite) free module $F$ such that $F \oplus P$ is free. Then of course $(0, s)$ is contained in a finite free direct summand $K \subset F \oplus P$. In turn $K$ is contained in $F' \oplus P$ where $F' \subset F$ is a finite free direct summand. $\square$

Lemma 15.128.4. Let $R$ be a ring with Jacobson radical $J$ such that $R/J$ is Noetherian. Let $P$ be a projective $R$-module such that $P_\mathfrak m$ has infinite rank for all maximal ideals $\mathfrak m$ of $R$. Let $s \in P$ and $M \subset P$ such that $Rs + M = P$. Then we can find $m \in M$ such that $R(s + m)$ is a free direct summand of $P$.

Proof. The statement makes sense as $P_\mathfrak m$ is free by Algebra, Theorem 10.85.4.

Denote $M' \subset P/JP$ the image of $M$ and $s' \in P/JP$ the image of $s$. Observe that $R/J s' + M' = P/JP$. Suppose we can find $m' \in M'$ such that $R/J(s' + m')$ is a free direct summand of $M'$. Choose $\varphi ' : P/JP \to R/J$ which gives a splitting, i.e., we have $\varphi '(s' + m') = 1$ in $R/J$. Then since $P$ is a projective $R$-module we can find a lift $\varphi : P \to R$ of $\varphi '$. Choose $m \in M$ mapping to $m'$. Then $\varphi (s + m) \in R$ is congruent to $1$ modulo $J$ and hence a unit in $R$ (Algebra, Lemma 10.19.1). Whence $R(s + m)$ is a free direct summand of $P$. This reduces us to the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume $R$ is Noetherian. Let $m \in M$ be an element and let $\varphi _1, \ldots , \varphi _ n : P \to R$ be $R$-linear maps. Denote

\[ Z(s + m, \varphi _1, \ldots , \varphi _ n) \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) \]

the vanishing locus of $\varphi _1(s + m), \ldots , \varphi _ n(s + m) \in R$.

Suppose $\mathfrak m$ is a maximal ideal of $R$ and $\mathfrak m \in Z(s, \varphi _1, \ldots , \varphi _ n)$. Set $K = M \cap \bigcap \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\varphi _ i)$. We claim the image of

\[ K/\mathfrak mK \to P/\mathfrak m P \]

has infinite dimension. Namely, the quotient $P/K$ is a finite $R$-module as it is isomorphic to a submodule of $P/M \oplus R^{\oplus n}$. Thus we see that the kernel of the displayed arrow is a quotient of $\text{Tor}_1^ R(P/K, \kappa (\mathfrak m))$ which is finite by Algebra, Lemma 10.75.7. Combined with the fact that $P/\mathfrak mP$ has infinite dimension we obtain our claim. Thus we can find a $t \in K$ which maps to a nonzero element $\overline{t}$ of the vector space $P/\mathfrak mP$. By linear algebra, we find an $R$-linear map $\overline{\varphi } : P \to \kappa (\mathfrak m)$ such that $\overline{\varphi }(\overline{t}) = 1$. Since $P$ is projective, we can find an $R$-linear map $\varphi : P \to R$ lifting $\overline{\varphi }$. Then we see that the vanishing locus $Z(s + m + t, \varphi _1, \ldots , \varphi _ n, \varphi )$ is contained in $Z(s + m, \varphi _1, \ldots , \varphi _ n)$ but does not contain $\mathfrak m$, i.e., it is strictly smaller than $Z(s + m, \varphi _1, \ldots , \varphi _ n)$.

Since $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ is a Noetherian topological space, we see from the arguments above that we may find $m \in M$ and $\varphi _1, \ldots , \varphi _ n : P \to R$ such that the closed subset $Z(s + m, \varphi _1, \ldots , \varphi _ n)$ does not contain any closed points of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$. Hence $Z(s + m, \varphi _1, \ldots , \varphi _ n) = \emptyset $. Hence we can find $r_1, \ldots , r_ n \in R$ such that $\sum r_ i\varphi _ i(s + m) = 1$. Hence

\[ R \xrightarrow {s + m} P \xrightarrow {\sum r_ i \varphi _ i} R \]

is the desired splitting. $\square$

Lemma 15.128.5. Let $R$ be a ring with Jacobson radical $J$ such that $R/J$ is Noetherian. Let $P$ be a projective $R$-module such that $P_\mathfrak m$ has infinite rank for all maximal ideals $\mathfrak m$ of $R$. Let $s \in P$. Then we can find a finite stably free direct summand $M \subset P$ such that $s \in M$.

Proof. By Lemma 15.128.3 we can find a finite free module $F$ and a finite free direct summand $K \subset F \oplus P$ such that $(0, s) \in K$. By induction on the rank of $F$ we reduce to the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume there exists a finite stably free direct summand $K \subset R \oplus P$ such that $(0, s) \in K$. Choose a complement $K'$ of $K$, i.e., such that $R \oplus P = K \oplus K'$. The projection $\pi : R \oplus P \to K'$ is surjectve, hence by Lemma 15.128.4 we find a $p \in P$ such that $\pi (1, p) \in K'$ generates a free direct summand. Accordingly we write $K' = R\pi (1, p) \oplus K''$. We see that

\[ R \oplus P = K \oplus K' = K \oplus R\pi (1, p) \oplus K'' \]

The projection $\pi ' : P \to K''$ is surjective1 and hence split (as $K''$ is projective). Thus $\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\pi ') \subset P$ is a direct summand containing $s$. Finally, by construction we have an isomorphism

\[ R \oplus \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\pi ') \cong K \oplus R\pi (1, p) \]

and hence since $K$ is finite and stably free, so is $\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\pi ')$. $\square$

reference

Theorem 15.128.6. Let $R$ be a ring with Jacobson radical $J$ such that $R/J$ is Noetherian. Let $P$ be a countably generated projective $R$-module such that $P_\mathfrak m$ has infinite rank for all maximal ideals $\mathfrak m$ of $R$. Then $P$ is free.

Proof. We first prove that $P$ is a countable direct sum of finite stably free modules. Let $x_1, x_2, \ldots $ be a countable set of generators for $P$. We inductively construct finite stably free direct summands $F_1, F_2, \ldots $ of $P$ such that for all $n$ we have that $F_1 \oplus \ldots \oplus F_ n$ is a direct summand of $P$ which contains $x_1, \ldots , x_ n$. Namely, given $F_1, \ldots , F_ n$ with the desired properties, write

\[ P = F_1 \oplus \ldots \oplus F_ n \oplus P' \]

and let $s \in P'$ be the image of $x_{n + 1}$. By Lemma 15.128.5 we can find a finite stably free direct summand $F_{n + 1} \subset P'$ containing $s$. Then $P = \bigoplus _{i = 1}^{\infty } F_ i$.

Assume that $P$ is an infinite direct sum $P = \bigoplus _{i = 1}^{\infty } F_ i$ of nonzero finite stably free modules. The stable freeness of the modules $F_ i$ will be used in the following manner: the rank of each $F_ i$ is constant (and positive). Hence we see that $P_\mathfrak m$ is free of countably infinite rank for each maximal ideal $\mathfrak m$ of $R$. By Lemma 15.128.4 applied with $s = 0$ and $M = P$, we can find a $t_1 \in P$ such that $Rt_1$ is a free direct summand of $P$. Then $t_1$ is contained in $F_1 \oplus \ldots \oplus F_{n_1}$ for some $n_1 > n_0 = 0$. The same reasoning applied to $\bigoplus _{n > n_1} F_ n$ produces an $n_1 < n_2$ and $t_2 \in F_{n_1 + 1} \oplus \ldots \oplus F_{n_2}$ which generates a free direct summand. Continuing in this fashion we obtain a free direct summand

\[ \bigoplus \nolimits _{i \geq 1} t_ i : \bigoplus \nolimits _{i \geq 1} R \longrightarrow \bigoplus \nolimits _{i \geq 1} \bigoplus \nolimits _{n_ i \geq n > n_{i - 1}} F_ n = P \]

of infinite rank. Thus we see that $P \cong Q \oplus F$ for some free $R$-module $F$ of countable rank. Since $Q$ is countably generated it follows that $Q \oplus Q' \cong F$ for some module $Q'$. Then the Eilenberg swindle (Lemma 15.128.1) implies that $Q \oplus F \cong F$ and $P$ is free. $\square$

[1] Namely, if $k'' \in K''$ then $k''$ viewed as an element of $K'$ can be written as $k'' = \lambda \pi (1, 0) + \pi (0, q)$ for some $\lambda \in R$ and $q \in P$. This means $k'' = \lambda \pi (1, p) + \pi (0, q - \lambda p)$. This in turn means that $q - \lambda p$ maps to $k''$ by the composition $P \to R \oplus P \xrightarrow {\pi } K' \to K''$ since $K' \to K''$ annihilates $\pi (1, p)$.

Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0GVE. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.