The Stacks project

Lemma 33.25.11. Let $X$ be a scheme of finite type over a field $k$. There exists a finite purely inseparable extension $k'/k$, an integer $t \geq 0$, and closed subschemes

\[ X_{k'} \supset Z_0 \supset Z_1 \supset \ldots \supset Z_ t = \emptyset \]

such that $Z_0 = (X_{k'})_{red}$ and $Z_ i \setminus Z_{i + 1}$ is smooth over $k'$ for all $i$.

Proof. We may use induction on $\dim (X)$. By Lemma 33.6.11 we can find a finite purely inseparable extension $k'/k$ such that $(X_{k'})_{red}$ is geometrically reduced over $k'$. By Lemma 33.25.7 there is a nowhere dense closed subscheme $X' \subset (X_{k'})_{red}$ such that $(X_{k'})_{red} \setminus X'$ is smooth over $k'$. Then $\dim (X') < \dim (X)$. By induction hypothesis there exists a finite purely inseparable extension $k''/k'$, an integer $t' \geq 0$, and closed subschemes

\[ X'_{k''} \supset Y_0 \supset Y_1 \supset \ldots \supset Y_{t'} = \emptyset \]

such that $Y_0 = (X'_{k''})_{red}$ and $Y_ i \setminus Y_{i + 1}$ is smooth over $k''$ for all $i$. Then we let $t = t' + 1$ and we consider

\[ X_{k''} \supset Z_0 \supset Z_1 \supset \ldots \supset Z_ t = \emptyset \]

given by $Z_0 = (X_{k''})_{red}$ and $Z_ i = Y_{i - 1}$ for $i > 0$; this makes sense as $X'_{k''}$ is a closed subscheme of $X_{k''}$. We omit the verification that all the stated properties hold. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0H3W. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.