Lemma 62.11.1. The construction above is bilinear, i.e., we have $(\alpha _1 + \alpha _2) \cap \beta = \alpha _1 \cap \beta + \alpha _2 \cap \beta $ and $\alpha \cap (\beta _1 + \beta _2) = \alpha \cap \beta _1 + \alpha \cap \beta _2$.

## 62.11 Action on cycles

Let $S$ be a locally Noetherian, universally catenary scheme endowed with a dimension function $\delta $, see Chow Homology, Section 42.7. Let $X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$, both locally of finite type over $S$. Let $r \geq 0$. Finally, let $\alpha $ be a family of $r$-cycles on fibres of $X/Y$. For $e \in \mathbf{Z}$ we will construct an operation

Namely, given $\beta \in Z_ e(Y)$ write $\beta = \sum n_ i[Z_ i]$ where $Z_ i \subset Y$ is an integral closed subscheme of $\delta $-dimension $e$ and the family $Z_ i$ is locally finite in the scheme $Y$. Let $y_ i \in Z_ i$ be the generic point. Write $\alpha _{y_ i} = \sum m_{ij} [V_{ij}]$. Thus $V_{ij} \subset X_{y_ i}$ is an integral closed subscheme of dimension $r$ and the family $V_{ij}$ is locally finite in the scheme $X_{y_ i}$. Then we set

Here $\overline{V}_{ij} \subset X$ is the scheme theoretic image of the morphism $V_{ij} \to X_{y_ i} \to X$ or equivalently, $\overline{V}_{ij} \subset X$ is an integral closed subscheme mapping dominantly to $Z_ i \subset Y$ whose generic fibre is $V_{ij}$. It follows readily that $\dim _\delta (\overline{V}_{ij}) = r + e$ and that the family of closed subschemes $\overline{V}_{ij} \subset X$ is locally finite (we omit the verifications). Hence $\alpha \cap \beta $ is indeed an element of $Z_{r + e}(X)$.

**Proof.**
Omitted.
$\square$

Lemma 62.11.2. If $U \subset X$ and $V \subset Y$ are open and $f(U) \subset V$, then $(\alpha \cap \beta )|_ U$ is equal to $\alpha |_ U \cap \beta |_ V$.

**Proof.**
Immediate from the explict description of $\alpha \cap \beta $ given above.
$\square$

Lemma 62.11.3. Forming $\alpha \cap \beta $ is compatible with flat base change and flat pullback (see proof for elucidation).

**Proof.**
Let $(S, \delta )$, $(S', \delta ')$, $g : S' \to S$, and $c \in \mathbf{Z}$ be as in Chow Homology, Situation 42.67.1. Let $X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes locally of finite type over $S$. Denote $X' \to Y'$ the base change of $X \to Y$ by $g$. Let $\alpha $ be a family of $r$-cycles on the fibres of $X/Y$. Let $\beta \in Z_ e(Y)$. Denote $\alpha '$ the base change of $\alpha $ by $Y' \to Y$. Denote $\beta ' = g^*\beta \in Z_{e + c}(Y')$ the pullback of $\beta $ by $g$, see Chow Homology, Section 42.67. Compatibility with base change means $\alpha ' \cap \beta '$ is the base change of $\alpha \cap \beta $.

Proof of compatibility with base change. Since we are proving an equality of cycles on $X'$, we may work locally on $Y$, see Lemma 62.11.2. Thus we may assume $Y$ is affine. In particular $\beta $ is a finite linear combination of prime cycles. Since $- \cap -$ is linear in the second variable (Lemma 62.11.1), it suffices to prove the equality when $\beta = [Z]$ for some integral closed subscheme $Z \subset Y$ of $\delta $-dimension $e$.

Let $y \in Z$ be the generic point. Write $\alpha _ y = \sum m_ j [V_ j]$. Let $\overline{V}_ j$ be the closure of $V_ j$ in $X$. Then we have

The base change of $\beta $ is $\beta ' = \sum [Z \times _ S S']_{e + c}$ as a cycle on $Y' = Y \times _ S S'$. Let $Z'_ a \subset Z \times _ S S'$ be the irreducible components, denote $y'_ a \in Z'_ a$ their generic points, and denote $n_ a$ the multiplicity of $Z'_ a$ in $Z \times _ S S'$. We have

We have $\alpha '_{y'_ a} = \sum m_ j [V_{j, \kappa (y'_ a)}]_ r$ because $\alpha '$ is the base change of $\alpha $ by $Y' \to Y$. Let $V'_{jab} \subset V_{j, \kappa (y'_ a)}$ be the irreducible components and denote $m_{jab}$ the multiplicity of $V'_{jab}$ in $V_{j, \kappa (y'_ a)}$. We have

Thus we we have

where $\overline{V}'_{jab}$ is the closure of $V'_{jab}$ in $X'$. Thus to prove the desired equality it suffices to prove

the irreducible components of $\overline{V}_ j \times _ S S'$ are the schemes $\overline{V}'_{jab}$ and

the multiplicity of $\overline{V}'_{jab}$ in $\overline{V}_ j \times _ S S'$ is equal to $n_ a m_{jab}$.

Note that $V_ j \to \overline{V}_ j$ is a birational morphism of integral schemes. The morphisms $V_ j \times _ S S' \to V_ j$ and $\overline{V}_ j \times _ S S' \to \overline{V}_ j$ are flat and hence map generic points of irreducible components to the (unique) generic points of $V_ j$ and $\overline{V}_ j$. It follows that $V_ j \times _ S S' \to \overline{V}_ j \times _ S S'$ is a birational morphisms hence induces a bijection on irreducible components and identifies their multiplicities. This means that it suffices to prove that the irreducible components of $V_ j \times _ S S'$ are the schemes $V'_{jab}$ and the multiplicity of $V'_{jab}$ in $V_ j \times _ S S'$ is equal to $n_ a m_{jab}$. However, then we are just saying that the diagram

is commutative where the horizontal arrows are base change by $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (y)) \times _ S S' \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (y))$ and the vertical arrows are flat pullback. This was shown in Chow Homology, Lemma 42.67.5.

The statement in the lemma on flat pullback means the following. Let $(S, \delta )$, $X \to Y$, $\alpha $, and $\beta $ be as in the constuction of $\alpha \cap \beta $ above. Let $Y' \to Y$ be a flat morphism, locally of finite type, and of relative dimension $c$. Then we can let $\alpha '$ be the base change of $\alpha $ by $Y' \to Y$ and $\beta '$ the flat pullback of $\beta $. Compatibility with flat pullback means $\alpha ' \cap \beta '$ is the flat pullback of $\alpha \cap \beta $ by $X \times _ Y Y' \to Y$. This is actually a special case of the discussion above if we set $S = Y$ and $S' = Y'$. $\square$

Lemma 62.11.4. Let $(S, \delta )$ and $f : X \to Y$ be as above. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module with $\dim (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_ y)) \leq r$ for all $y \in Y$. Let $\mathcal{G}$ be a coherent $\mathcal{O}_ Y$-module with $\dim _\delta (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{G})) \leq e$. Set $\alpha = [\mathcal{F}/X/Y]_ r$ (Example 62.5.2) and $\beta = [\mathcal{G}]_ e$ (Chow Homology, Definition 42.10.2). If $\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $Y$, then $\alpha \cap \beta = [\mathcal{F} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} f^*\mathcal{G}]_{r + e}$.

**Proof.**
Observe that

It follows that this is a closed subset of $\delta $-dimension $\leq r + e$. Whence the expression $[\mathcal{F} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} f^*\mathcal{G}]_{r + e}$ makes sense.

We will use the notation $\beta = \sum n_ i[Z_ i]$, $y_ i \in Z_ i$, $\alpha _{y_ i} = \sum m_{ij} [V_{ij}]$, and $\overline{V}_{ij}$ introduced in the construction of $\alpha \cap \beta $. Since $\beta = [\mathcal{G}]_ e$ we see that the $Z_ i$ are the irreducible components of $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{G})$ which have $\delta $-dimension $e$. Similarly, the $V_{ij}$ are the irreducible components of $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_{y_ i})$ having dimension $r$. It follows from this and the equation in the first paragraph that $\overline{V}_{ij}$ are the irreducible components of $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} f^*\mathcal{G})$ having $\delta $-dimension $r + e$. Thus to prove the lemma it now suffices to show that

By the first paragraph of the proof the left hand side is equal to the lenth of the $B = \mathcal{O}_{X, \xi _{ij}}$-module

Here $M = \mathcal{G}_{y_ i}$ is a finite length $A = \mathcal{O}_{Y, y_ i}$-module and $N = \mathcal{F}_{\xi _{ij}}$ is a finite $B$-module such that $N/\mathfrak m_ AN$ has finite length. Since $\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $Y$ the module $N$ is $A$-flat. The right hand side of the formula is equal to

Thus the right and left hand side of the formula are additive in $M$ (use flatness of $N$ over $A$). Thus it suffices to prove the formula with $M = \kappa _ A$ is the residue field in which case it is immediate. $\square$

Lemma 62.11.5. Let $(S, \delta )$ and $f : X \to Y$ be as above. Let $Z \subset X$ be a closed subscheme of relative dimension $\leq r$ over $Y$. Set $\alpha = [Z/X/Y]_ r$ (Example 62.5.4). Let $W \subset Y$ be a closed subscheme of $\delta $-dimension $\leq e$. Set $\beta = [W]_ e$ (Chow Homology, Definition 42.9.2). If $Z$ is flat over $Y$, then $\alpha \cap \beta = [Z \times _ Y W]_{r + e}$.

**Proof.**
This is a special case of Lemma 62.11.4 if we take $\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{O}_ Z$ and $\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{O}_ W$.
$\square$

Lemma 62.11.6. Let $(S, \delta )$ be as above. Let

be a cartesian diagram of schemes locally of finite type over $S$ with $g$ proper. Let $r, e \geq 0$. Let $\alpha $ be a family of $r$-cycles on the fibres of $X/Y$. Let $\beta ' \in Z_ e(Y')$. Then we have $f_*(g^*\alpha \cap \beta ') = \alpha \cap g_*\beta '$.

**Proof.**
Since we are proving an equality of cycles on $X$, we may work locally on $Y$, see Lemma 62.11.2. Thus we may assume $Y$ is affine. Thus $Y'$ is quasi-compact. In particular $\beta '$ is a finite linear combination of prime cycles. Since $- \cap -$ is linear in the second variable (Lemma 62.11.1), it suffices to prove the equality when $\beta ' = [Z']$ for some integral closed subscheme $Z' \subset Y'$ of $\delta $-dimension $e$. Set $Z = g(Z')$. This is an integral closed subscheme of $Y$ of $\delta $-dimension $\leq e$. For simplicity we are going to assume $Z$ has $\delta $-dimension equal to $e$ and leave the other case (which is easier) to the reader. Let $y \in Z$ and $y' \in Z'$ be the generic points. Write $\alpha _ y = \sum m_ j[V_ j]$ with $V_ j \subset X_ y$ integral closed subschemes of dimension $r$.

Assume first $g$ is a closed immersion. Then $g_*\beta ' = [Z]$ and $(g^*\alpha )_{y'} = \sum n_ j[V_ j]$; this makes sense because $V_ j$ is contained in the closed subscheme $X'_{y'}$ of $X_ y$. Thus in this case the equality is obvious: in both cases we obtain $\sum m_ j[\overline{V}_ j]$ where $\overline{V}_ j$ is the closure of $V_ j$ in the closed subscheme $X' \subset X$.

Back to the general case with $\beta ' = [Z']$ as above. Set $W = Z \times _ X Y$ and $W' = Z' \times _{X'} Y'$. Consider the cartesian squares

Since we know the result for the first two squares with by the previous paragraph, a formal argument shows that it suffices to prove the result for the last square and the element $\beta ' = [Z'] \in Z_ e(Z')$. This reduces us to the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume $Y' \to Y$ is a generically finite morphism of integral schemes of $\delta $-dimension $e$ and $\beta ' = [Y']$. In this case both $f_*(g^*\alpha \cap \beta ')$ and $\alpha \cap g_*\beta '$ are cycles which can be written as a sum of prime cycles dominant over $Y$. Thus we may replace $Y$ by a nonempty open subscheme in order to check the equality. After such a replacement we may assume $g$ is finite and flat, say of degree $d \geq 1$. Of course, this means that $g_*\beta ' = g_*[Y'] = d[Y]$. Also $\beta ' = [Y'] = g^*[Y]$. Hence

as desired. The second equality is Lemma 62.11.3 and the third equality is Chow Homology, Lemma 42.15.2. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)