The Stacks project

Lemma 15.64.2. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $K^\bullet $ be a filtered complex. There exists a map $f : P^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ of filtered complexes such that

  1. each $P^ n$, $F^ iP^ n$, $\text{gr}^ iP^ n$ is a free $R$-module,

  2. the complexes of $R$-modules $P^\bullet $, $F^ iP^\bullet $, and $\text{gr}^ iP^\bullet $ are K-flat,

  3. $f$ induces quasi-isomorphisms $P^\bullet \to K^\bullet $, $F^ iP^\bullet \to F^ iK^\bullet $, and $\text{gr}^ iP^\bullet \to \text{gr}^ iK^\bullet $.

Proof. Let us say a filtered complex $L^\bullet $ is basic if each $L^ n$, $F^ iL^ n$, $\text{gr}^ iL^ n$ is a free $R$-module and if all differentials are zero.

There exists a basic filtered complex $P_0^\bullet $ and a map $f_0 : P_0^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ of filtered complexes such that $f_0$ and $F^ if_0$, $i \in \mathbf{Z}$ are surjective on cohomology. To see this set

\[ P_0^ n = \bigoplus \nolimits _{z \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d_ K^ n)} R \xi _ z \oplus \bigoplus \nolimits _{j \in \mathbf{Z}} \bigoplus \nolimits _{z \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d_{F^ jK}^ n)} R \xi _ z \]

with zero differentials and the map $f_0$ defined by $f_0(\xi _ z) = z$. As for the filtration, we set

\[ F^ iP_0^ n = \bigoplus \nolimits _{j \geq i \in \mathbf{Z}} \bigoplus \nolimits _{z \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d_{F^ jK}^ n)} R \xi _ z \]

We leave it to the reader to check that this gives $f_0 : P_0^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ as claimed.

By induction on $m \geq 0$ we are going to construct embeddings

\[ P_0^\bullet \subset \ldots P_ m^\bullet \subset P_{m + 1}^\bullet \]

of filtered complexes and maps $f_ m : P_ m^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ with the following properties

  1. the filtered complex $P_{m + 1}^\bullet / P_ m^\bullet $ is basic,

  2. the kernel of $H^ n(f_ m)$ and $H^ n(F^ if_ m)$ maps to zero in $H^ n(P_{m + 1}^\bullet )$ and $H^ n(F^ iP_{m + 1}^\bullet )$,

  3. the map $f_{m + 1} : P_{m + 1}^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ extends the map $f_ m$.

To to this, set

\[ \Omega _{n, m} = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}\left(\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d^ n_{P_ m}) \to H^ n(K^\bullet )\right), \text{ resp. } \Omega _{n, i, m} = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}\left(\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(d^ n_{F^ iP_ m}) \to H^ n(F^ iK^\bullet )\right), \]

Note that $\Omega _{n, m}$ surjects onto the kernel of $H^ n(f_ m)$ and that $\Omega _{n, i, m}$ surjects onto the kernel of $H^ n(F^ if_ n)$. For each $z \in \Omega _{n, m}$, resp. $z \in \Omega _{n, i, m}$ we choose a $y_ z \in K^{n - 1}$, resp. $y_ z \in F^ iK^{n - 1}$ such that $d_ K(y_ z) = f_ m(z)$. Then we set

\[ P^ n_{m + 1} = P_ m^ n \oplus \bigoplus \nolimits _{z \in \Omega _{n + 1, m}} R \eta _ z \oplus \bigoplus \nolimits _{j \in \mathbf{Z}} \bigoplus \nolimits _{z \in \Omega _{n + 1, j, m}} R \eta _ z \]

We set $d_{P_ m}(\eta _ z) = z$ and we set $f_{m + 1}(\eta _ z) = y_ z$. Finally, we set

\[ F^ iP_{m + 1}^ n = F^ iP_ m^ n \oplus \bigoplus \nolimits _{j \geq i} \bigoplus \nolimits _{z \in \Omega _{n + 1, j, m}} R \eta _ z \]

We leave it to the reader to check that this gives $P_ m^\bullet \subset P_{m + 1}^\bullet $ and $f_{m + 1} : P_{m + 1}^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ as claimed.

At this point we simply take

\[ P^\bullet = \bigcup P_ m^\bullet \]

as a filtered complex with map $f : P^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ given by $\bigcup f_ m$.

Part (1) of the statement of the lemma holds because $P^ n$ as a filtered module is isomorphic to the direct sum of $P_0^ n$ and $P_{m + 1}^ n/P_ m^ n$ for $m \geq 0$. Small detail omitted.

Part (3) of the statement. Observe that $H^ n(P^\bullet ) = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits H^ n(P_ m^\bullet )$. The map $f_0$ is surjective on cohomology; whence the same holds for each $f_ m$. For each $m$ by construction the embedding $P_ m^\bullet \subset P_{m + 1}^\bullet $ kills the kernel of $H^ n(f_ m)$. Combining these facts the reader easily concludes that $H^ n(f)$ is an isomorphism. Similarly for $H^ n(F^ if_ n)$. Then also $H^ n(\text{gr}^ if)$ must be an isomorphism because of the short exact sequence $0 \to F^{i + 1} \to F^ i \to \text{gr}^ i \to 0$ (of functors on the category of filtered complexes, say). Small detail omitted.

Part (2) of the statement. To see that $P^\bullet $ is K-flat, by Lemma 15.59.8, it suffices to show that $P_ m^\bullet $ is K-flat. By Lemma 15.59.6 and induction it suffices to note that a complex with zero differentials and free terms is K-flat. The same argument works to show that $F^ iP^\bullet $ is K-flat for all $i \in \mathbf{Z}$. Finally, we see that $\text{gr}^ iP^\bullet $ is K-flat by another application of Lemma 15.59.6. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0H7X. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.