The Stacks project

Lemma 37.54.3 (Longke Tang). Let $f : X \to S$ be a surjective morphism of finite presentation. Let $M$ be an object of $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ S)$ such that $H^ i(M) = 0$ for $i > 0$. The following are equivalent

  1. $M$ is isomorphic to a flat $\mathcal{O}_ S$-module placed in degree $0$,

  2. $Lf^*M$ is isomorphic to a flat $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module placed in degree $0$.

Proof. We omit the proof that (1) implies (2). Assume (2). To prove (1) is a local question, hence we may assume that $S$ is affine. Choose a stratification $S \supset S_0 \supset S_1 \supset \ldots \supset S_ t = \emptyset $ as in Lemma 37.54.2. Set $T_ i = S_ i \setminus S_{i - 1}$ and $Y_ i = X \times _ S T_ i$. Denote $g_ i : T_ i \to S$ and $h_ i : Y_ i \to X$ the inclusion morphisms. Since $f$ is surjective, the morphisms $f_ i : X_ i \to T_ i$ are surjective and flat. Since $Lh_ i^* \circ Lf^* = Lf_ i^* \circ Lg_ i^*$ we conclude from (2) that $Lf_ i^* Lg_ i^*M$ is isomorphic to a flat $\mathcal{O}_{Y_ i}$-module placed in degree $0$. Since $f_ i$ is flat and surjective, we see that $Lg_ i^*M$ is isomorphic to a flat $\mathcal{O}_{T_ i}$-module placed in degree $0$.

We will prove this implies the result by induction on $t$. We will use the following notation: $S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ and $M$ is the object of $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ S)$ corresponding to $N$ in $D(A)$, see Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma 36.3.5.

Base case: $t = 1$. Write $S_0 = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A/I)$ where $I$ is a finite generated ideal. Then $I$ is nilpotent as $S_0 = S$ set theoretically. The assumption is that $N \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} A/I$ has tor amplitude in $[0, 0]$. By More on Algebra, Lemma 15.67.20 the same is true for $N$.

Induction step. Assume $t > 1$. Write $S_{t - 1} = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A/I)$ where $I = (f_1, \ldots , f_ r)$ is a finitely generated ideal. We will argue by induction on $r$. Observe that $N_{f_ r} = N \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} A_{f_ r}$ in $D(A_{f_ r})$ has tor amplitude in $[0, 0]$ by induction hypothesis (because the stratification on the principal open $D(f_ r)$ has length at most $t - 1$). On the other hand, consider $N' = N \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} A/f_ rA$ in $D(A/f_ rA)$. Setting $S' = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A/f_ rA)$ we obtain a stratification

\[ S' \supset S' \cap S_0 \supset S' \cap S_1 \supset \ldots \supset S' \cap S_{t - 1} \supset S' \cap S_ t = \emptyset \]

where $S' \cap S_{t - 1}$ is cut out by $r - 1$ equations in $S'$. Similarly to before, the derived pullbacks of $M$ to the parts $S' \cap S_ i \setminus S' \cap S_{i + 1}$ are of tor amplitude in $[0, 0]$. Whence by induction on $r$ we conclude that $N'$ has tor amplitude in $[0, 0]$. Then we finally conclude that $N$ has tor amplitude in $[0, 0]$ by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.103.7. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0H89. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.