The Stacks project

Proposition 10.38.7. Let $R \subset S$ be an inclusion of domains. Assume $R$ is normal and $S$ integral over $R$. Let $\mathfrak p \subset \mathfrak p' \subset R$ be primes. Let $\mathfrak q'$ be a prime of $S$ with $\mathfrak p' = R \cap \mathfrak q'$. Then there exists a prime $\mathfrak q$ with $\mathfrak q \subset \mathfrak q'$ such that $\mathfrak p = R \cap \mathfrak q$. In other words: the going down property holds for $R \to S$, see Definition 10.41.1.

Proof. Let $\mathfrak p$, $\mathfrak p'$ and $\mathfrak q'$ be as in the statement. We have to show there is a prime $\mathfrak q$, with $\mathfrak q \subset \mathfrak q'$ and $R \cap \mathfrak q = \mathfrak p$. This is the same as finding a prime of $S_{\mathfrak q'}$ mapping to $\mathfrak p$. According to Lemma 10.17.9 we have to show that $\mathfrak p S_{\mathfrak q'} \cap R = \mathfrak p$. Pick $z \in \mathfrak p S_{\mathfrak q'} \cap R$. We may write $z = y/g$ with $y \in \mathfrak pS$ and $g \in S$, $g \not\in \mathfrak q'$. Written differently we have $zg = y$.

By Lemma 10.38.4 there exists a monic polynomial $P = x^ m + b_{m-1} x^{m-1} + \ldots + b_0$ with $b_ i \in \mathfrak p$ such that $P(y) = 0$.

By Lemma 10.38.6 the minimal polynomial of $g$ over $K$ has coefficients in $R$. Write it as $Q = x^ n + a_{n-1} x^{n-1} + \ldots + a_0$. Note that not all $a_ i$, $i = n-1, \ldots , 0$ are in $\mathfrak p$ since that would imply $g^ n = \sum _{j < n} a_ j g^ j \in \mathfrak pS \subset \mathfrak p'S \subset \mathfrak q'$ which is a contradiction.

Since $y = zg$ we see immediately from the above that $Q' = x^ n + za_{n-1} x^{n-1} + \ldots + z^{n}a_0$ is the minimal polynomial for $y$. Hence $Q'$ divides $P$ and by Lemma 10.38.5 we see that $z^ ja_{n - j} \in \sqrt{(b_0, \ldots , b_{m-1})} \subset \mathfrak p$, $j = 1, \ldots , n$. Because not all $a_ i$, $i = n-1, \ldots , 0$ are in $\mathfrak p$ we conclude $z \in \mathfrak p$ as desired. $\square$

Comments (2)

Comment #4230 by Daniel Gulotta on

I believe this argument still works if the assumpton " is a domain'' is replaced with the weaker assumption " is torsionfree as an -module".

Comment #4410 by on

You could also say this: if is a ring map and has going down for every minimal prime ideal of , then has going down. Namely, every prime is going to contain one of the minimal primes of and then you can work in .

Thus if is a normal domain, is integral, and every minimal prime of maps to the generic point of , then we have going down for by the proposition and what I just said. Your statement is a special case of this.

If somebody needs this I will add it to the Stacks project, but there currently isn't a really good place to put it.

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 00H8. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.