The Stacks project

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

10.146 Formally étale maps

Definition 10.146.1. Let $R \to S$ be a ring map. We say $S$ is formally étale over $R$ if for every commutative solid diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ S \ar[r] \ar@{-->}[rd] & A/I \\ R \ar[r] \ar[u] & A \ar[u] } \]

where $I \subset A$ is an ideal of square zero, there exists a unique dotted arrow making the diagram commute.

Clearly a ring map is formally étale if and only if it is both formally smooth and formally unramified.

Lemma 10.146.2. Let $R \to S$ be a ring map of finite presentation. The following are equivalent:

  1. $R \to S$ is formally étale,

  2. $R \to S$ is étale.

Proof. Assume that $R \to S$ is formally étale. Then $R \to S$ is smooth by Proposition 10.136.13. By Lemma 10.144.2 we have $\Omega _{S/R} = 0$. Hence $R \to S$ is étale by definition.

Assume that $R \to S$ is étale. Then $R \to S$ is formally smooth by Proposition 10.136.13. By Lemma 10.144.2 it is formally unramified. Hence $R \to S$ is formally étale. $\square$

Lemma 10.146.3. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $I$ be a directed set. Let $(S_ i, \varphi _{ii'})$ be a system of $R$-algebras over $I$. If each $R \to S_ i$ is formally étale, then $S = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i \in I} S_ i$ is formally étale over $R$

Proof. Consider a diagram as in Definition 10.146.1. By assumption we get unique $R$-algebra maps $S_ i \to A$ lifting the compositions $S_ i \to S \to A/I$. Hence these are compatible with the transition maps $\varphi _{ii'}$ and define a lift $S \to A$. This proves existence. The uniqueness is clear by restricting to each $S_ i$. $\square$

Lemma 10.146.4. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $S \subset R$ be any multiplicative subset. Then the ring map $R \to S^{-1}R$ is formally étale.

Proof. Let $I \subset A$ be an ideal of square zero. What we are saying here is that given a ring map $\varphi : R \to A$ such that $\varphi (f) \mod I$ is invertible for all $f \in S$ we have also that $\varphi (f)$ is invertible in $A$ for all $f \in S$. This is true because $A^*$ is the inverse image of $(A/I)^*$ under the canonical map $A \to A/I$. $\square$


Comments (2)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 00UP. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.