Lemma 10.152.2. Let $R \to S$ be a ring map. Let $\mathfrak q$ be a prime of $S$ lying over $\mathfrak p \subset R$. Assume that $R \to S$ is of finite type and unramified at $\mathfrak q$. Then there exist

1. an étale ring map $R \to R'$,

2. a prime $\mathfrak p' \subset R'$ lying over $\mathfrak p$.

3. a product decomposition

$R' \otimes _ R S = A \times B$

with the following properties

1. $R' \to A$ is surjective, and

2. $\mathfrak p'A$ is a prime of $A$ lying over $\mathfrak p'$ and over $\mathfrak q$.

Proof. We may replace $(R \to S, \mathfrak p, \mathfrak q)$ with any base change $(R' \to R'\otimes _ R S, \mathfrak p', \mathfrak q')$ by an étale ring map $R \to R'$ with a prime $\mathfrak p'$ lying over $\mathfrak p$, and a choice of $\mathfrak q'$ lying over both $\mathfrak q$ and $\mathfrak p'$. Note also that given $R \to R'$ and $\mathfrak p'$ a suitable $\mathfrak q'$ can always be found.

The assumption that $R \to S$ is of finite type means that we may apply Lemma 10.145.4. Thus we may assume that $S = A_1 \times \ldots \times A_ n \times B$, that each $R \to A_ i$ is finite with exactly one prime $\mathfrak r_ i$ lying over $\mathfrak p$ such that $\kappa (\mathfrak p) \subset \kappa (\mathfrak r_ i)$ is purely inseparable and that $R \to B$ is not quasi-finite at any prime lying over $\mathfrak p$. Then clearly $\mathfrak q = \mathfrak r_ i$ for some $i$, since an unramified morphism is quasi-finite (see Lemma 10.151.6). Say $\mathfrak q = \mathfrak r_1$. By Lemma 10.151.5 we see that $\kappa (\mathfrak p) \subset \kappa (\mathfrak r_1)$ is separable hence the trivial field extension, and that $\mathfrak p(A_1)_{\mathfrak r_1}$ is the maximal ideal. Also, by Lemma 10.41.11 (which applies to $R \to A_1$ because a finite ring map satisfies going up by Lemma 10.36.22) we have $(A_1)_{\mathfrak r_1} = (A_1)_{\mathfrak p}$. It follows from Nakayama's Lemma 10.20.1 that the map of local rings $R_{\mathfrak p} \to (A_1)_{\mathfrak p} = (A_1)_{\mathfrak r_1}$ is surjective. Since $A_1$ is finite over $R$ we see that there exists a $f \in R$, $f \not\in \mathfrak p$ such that $R_ f \to (A_1)_ f$ is surjective. After replacing $R$ by $R_ f$ we win. $\square$

## Comments (2)

Comment #3260 by Dario Weißmann on

Typo: by a etale ring map -> by an etale ring map.

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 00UX. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.