Lemma 7.39.1. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Let $(J, \geq , V_ j, g_{jj'})$ be a system as above with associated pair of functors $(u', p')$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a sheaf on $\mathcal{C}$. Let $s, s' \in \mathcal{F}_{p'}$ be distinct elements. Let $\{ W_ k \to W\} $ be a finite covering of $\mathcal{C}$. Let $f \in u'(W)$. There exists a refinement $(I, \geq , U_ i, f_{ii'})$ of $(J, \geq , V_ j, g_{jj'})$ such that $s, s'$ map to distinct elements of $\mathcal{F}_ p$ and that the image of $f$ in $u(W)$ is in the image of one of the $u(W_ k)$.

## 7.39 Criterion for existence of points

This section corresponds to Deligne's appendix to [ExposÃ© VI, SGA4]. In fact it is almost literally the same.

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Suppose that $(I, \geq )$ is a directed set, and that $(U_ i, f_{ii'})$ is an inverse system over $I$, see Categories, Definition 4.21.2. Given the data $(I, \geq , U_ i, f_{ii'})$ we define

Let $\mathcal{F} \mapsto \mathcal{F}_ p$ be the stalk functor associated to $u$ as in Section 7.32. It is direct from the definition that actually

in this special case. Note that $u$ commutes with all finite limits (I mean those that are representable in $\mathcal{C}$) because each of the functors $V \mapsto \mathop{Mor}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(U_ i , V)$ do, see Categories, Lemma 4.19.2.

We say that a system $(I, \geq , U_ i, f_{ii'})$ is a *refinement* of $(J, \geq , V_ j, g_{jj'})$ if $J \subset I$, the ordering on $J$ induced from that of $I$ and $V_ j = U_ j$, $g_{jj'} = f_{jj'}$ (in words, the inverse system over $J$ is induced by that over $I$). Let $u$ be the functor associated to $(I, \geq , U_ i, f_{ii'})$ and let $u'$ be the functor associated to $(J, \geq , V_ j, g_{jj'})$. This induces a transformation of functors

simply because the colimits for $u'$ are over a subsystem of the systems in the colimits for $u$. In particular we get an associated transformation of stalk functors $\mathcal{F}_{p'} \to \mathcal{F}_ p$, see Lemma 7.37.1.

**Proof.**
There exists a $j_0 \in J$ such that $f$ is defined by $f' : V_{j_0} \to W$. For $j \geq j_0$ we set $V_{j, k} = V_ j \times _{f'\circ f_{j j_0}, W} W_ k$. Then $\{ V_{j, k} \to V_ j\} $ is a finite covering in the site $\mathcal{C}$. Hence $\mathcal{F}(V_ j) \subset \prod _ k \mathcal{F}(V_{j, k})$. By Categories, Lemma 4.19.2 once again we see that

is injective. Hence there exists a $k$ such that $s$ and $s'$ have distinct image in $\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ j \mathcal{F}(V_{j, k})$. Let $J_0 = \{ j \in J, j \geq j_0\} $ and $I = J \amalg J_0$. We order $I$ so that no element of the second summand is smaller than any element of the first, but otherwise using the ordering on $J$. If $j \in I$ is in the first summand then we use $V_ j$ and if $j \in I$ is in the second summand then we use $V_{j, k}$. We omit the definition of the transition maps of the inverse system. By the above it follows that $s, s'$ have distinct image in $\mathcal{F}_ p$. Moreover, the restriction of $f'$ to $V_{j, k}$ factors through $W_ k$ by construction. $\square$

Lemma 7.39.2. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Let $(J, \geq , V_ j, g_{jj'})$ be a system as above with associated pair of functors $(u', p')$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a sheaf on $\mathcal{C}$. Let $s, s' \in \mathcal{F}_{p'}$ be distinct elements. There exists a refinement $(I, \geq , U_ i, f_{ii'})$ of $(J, \geq , V_ j, g_{jj'})$ such that $s, s'$ map to distinct elements of $\mathcal{F}_ p$ and such that for every finite covering $\{ W_ k \to W\} $ of the site $\mathcal{C}$, and any $f \in u'(W)$ the image of $f$ in $u(W)$ is in the image of one of the $u(W_ k)$.

**Proof.**
Let $E$ be the set of pairs $(\{ W_ k \to W\} , f\in u'(W))$. Consider pairs $(E' \subset E, (I, \geq , U_ i, f_{ii'}))$ such that

$(I, \geq , U_ i, g_{ii'})$ is a refinement of $(J, \geq , V_ j, g_{jj'})$,

$s, s'$ map to distinct elements of $\mathcal{F}_ p$, and

for every pair $(\{ W_ k \to W\} , f\in u'(W)) \in E'$ we have that the image of $f$ in $u(W)$ is in the image of one of the $u(W_ k)$.

We order such pairs by inclusion in the first factor and by refinement in the second. Denote $\mathcal{S}$ the class of all pairs $(E' \subset E, (I, \geq , U_ i, f_{ii'}))$ as above. We claim that the hypothesis of Zorn's lemma holds for $\mathcal{S}$. Namely, suppose that $(E'_ a, (I_ a, \geq , U_ i, f_{ii'}))_{a \in A}$ is a totally ordered subset of $\mathcal{S}$. Then we can define $E' = \bigcup _{a \in A} E'_ a$ and we can set $I = \bigcup _{a \in A} I_ a$. We claim that the corresponding pair $(E' , (I, \geq , U_ i, f_{ii'}))$ is an element of $\mathcal{S}$. Conditions (1) and (3) are clear. For condition (2) you note that

The distinctness of the images of $s, s'$ in this stalk follows from the description of a directed colimit of sets, see Categories, Section 4.19. We will simply write $(E', (I, \ldots )) = \bigcup _{a \in A}(E'_ a, (I_ a, \ldots ))$ in this situation.

OK, so Zorn's Lemma would apply if $\mathcal{S}$ was a set, and this would, combined with Lemma 7.39.1 above easily prove the lemma. It doesn't since $\mathcal{S}$ is a class. In order to circumvent this we choose a well ordering on $E$. For $e \in E$ set $E'_ e = \{ e' \in E \mid e' \leq e\} $. By transfinite induction we construct pairs $(E'_ e, (I_ e, \ldots )) \in \mathcal{S}$ such that $e_1 \leq e_2 \Rightarrow (E'_{e_1}, (I_{e_1}, \ldots )) \leq (E'_{e_2}, (I_{e_2}, \ldots ))$. Let $e \in E$, say $e = (\{ W_ k \to W\} , f\in u'(W))$. If $e$ has a predecessor $e - 1$, then we let $(I_ e, \ldots )$ be a refinement of $(I_{e - 1}, \ldots )$ as in Lemma 7.39.1 with respect to the system $e = (\{ W_ k \to W\} , f\in u'(W))$. If $e$ does not have a predecessor, then we let $(I_ e, \ldots )$ be a refinement of $\bigcup _{e' < e} (I_{e'}, \ldots )$ with respect to the system $e = (\{ W_ k \to W\} , f\in u'(W))$. Finally, the union $\bigcup _{e \in E} I_ e$ will be a solution to the problem posed in the lemma. $\square$

Proposition 7.39.3. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Assume that

finite limits exist in $\mathcal{C}$, and

every covering $\{ U_ i \to U\} _{i \in I}$ has a refinement by a finite covering of $\mathcal{C}$.

Then $\mathcal{C}$ has enough points.

**Proof.**
We have to show that given any sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $\mathcal{C}$, any $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$, and any distinct sections $s, s' \in \mathcal{F}(U)$, there exists a point $p$ such that $s, s'$ have distinct image in $\mathcal{F}_ p$. See Lemma 7.38.3. Consider the system $(J, \geq , V_ j, g_{jj'})$ with $J = \{ 1\} $, $V_1 = U$, $g_{11} = \text{id}_ U$. Apply Lemma 7.39.2. By the result of that lemma we get a system $(I, \geq , U_ i, f_{ii'})$ refining our system such that $s_ p \not= s'_ p$ and such that moreover for every finite covering $\{ W_ k \to W\} $ of the site $\mathcal{C}$ the map $\coprod _ k u(W_ k) \to u(W)$ is surjective. Since every covering of $\mathcal{C}$ can be refined by a finite covering we conclude that $\coprod _ k u(W_ k) \to u(W)$ is surjective for *any* covering $\{ W_ k \to W\} $ of the site $\mathcal{C}$. This implies that $u = p$ is a point, see Proposition 7.33.2 (and the discussion at the beginning of this section which guarantees that $u$ commutes with finite limits).
$\square$

Lemma 7.39.4. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Let $I$ be a set and for $i \in I$ let $U_ i$ be an object of $\mathcal{C}$ such that

$\coprod h_{U_ i}$ surjects onto the final object of $\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$, and

$\mathcal{C}/U_ i$ satisfies the hypotheses of Proposition 7.39.3.

Then $\mathcal{C}$ has enough points.

**Proof.**
By assumption (2) and the proposition $\mathcal{C}/U_ i$ has enough points. The points of $\mathcal{C}/U_ i$ give points of $\mathcal{C}$ via the procedure of Lemma 7.34.1. Thus it suffices to show: if $\phi : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}$ is a map of sheaves on $\mathcal{C}$ such that $\phi |_{\mathcal{C}/U_ i}$ is an isomorphism for all $i$, then $\phi $ is an isomorphism. By assumption (1) for every object $W$ of $\mathcal{C}$ there is a covering $\{ W_ j \to W\} _{j \in J}$ such that for $j \in J$ there is an $i \in I$ and a morphism $f_ j : W_ j \to U_ i$. Then the maps $\mathcal{F}(W_ j) \to \mathcal{G}(W_ j)$ are bijective and similarly for $\mathcal{F}(W_ j \times _ W W_{j'}) \to \mathcal{G}(W_ j \times _ W W_{j'})$. The sheaf condition tells us that $\mathcal{F}(W) \to \mathcal{G}(W)$ is bijective as desired.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)