Proposition 7.39.3. Let \mathcal{C} be a site. Assume that
finite limits exist in \mathcal{C}, and
every covering \{ U_ i \to U\} _{i \in I} has a refinement by a finite covering of \mathcal{C}.
Then \mathcal{C} has enough points.
[Exposé VI, Appendix by Deligne, Proposition 9.0, SGA4]
Proposition 7.39.3. Let \mathcal{C} be a site. Assume that
finite limits exist in \mathcal{C}, and
every covering \{ U_ i \to U\} _{i \in I} has a refinement by a finite covering of \mathcal{C}.
Then \mathcal{C} has enough points.
Proof. We have to show that given any sheaf \mathcal{F} on \mathcal{C}, any U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}), and any distinct sections s, s' \in \mathcal{F}(U), there exists a point p such that s, s' have distinct image in \mathcal{F}_ p. See Lemma 7.38.3. Consider the system (J, \geq , V_ j, g_{jj'}) with J = \{ 1\} , V_1 = U, g_{11} = \text{id}_ U. Apply Lemma 7.39.2. By the result of that lemma we get a system (I, \geq , U_ i, f_{ii'}) refining our system such that s_ p \not= s'_ p and such that moreover for every finite covering \{ W_ k \to W\} of the site \mathcal{C} the map \coprod _ k u(W_ k) \to u(W) is surjective. Since every covering of \mathcal{C} can be refined by a finite covering we conclude that \coprod _ k u(W_ k) \to u(W) is surjective for any covering \{ W_ k \to W\} of the site \mathcal{C}. This implies that u = p is a point, see Proposition 7.33.3 (and the discussion at the beginning of this section which guarantees that u commutes with finite limits). \square
Comments (3)
Comment #5087 by Anna on
Comment #5088 by Johan on
Comment #5298 by Johan on