Lemma 27.4.3. In Situation 27.3.1. The functor F is representable by a scheme.
Proof. We are going to use Schemes, Lemma 26.15.4.
First we check that F satisfies the sheaf property for the Zariski topology. Namely, suppose that T is a scheme, that T = \bigcup _{i \in I} U_ i is an open covering, and that (f_ i, \varphi _ i) \in F(U_ i) such that (f_ i, \varphi _ i)|_{U_ i \cap U_ j} = (f_ j, \varphi _ j)|_{U_ i \cap U_ j}. This implies that the morphisms f_ i : U_ i \to S glue to a morphism of schemes f : T \to S such that f|_{U_ i} = f_ i, see Schemes, Section 26.14. Thus f_ i^*\mathcal{A} = f^*\mathcal{A}|_{U_ i} and by assumption the morphisms \varphi _ i agree on U_ i \cap U_ j. Hence by Sheaves, Section 6.33 these glue to a morphism of \mathcal{O}_ T-algebras f^*\mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{O}_ T. This proves that F satisfies the sheaf condition with respect to the Zariski topology.
Let S = \bigcup _{i \in I} U_ i be an affine open covering. Let F_ i \subset F be the subfunctor consisting of those pairs (f : T \to S, \varphi ) such that f(T) \subset U_ i.
We have to show each F_ i is representable. This is the case because F_ i is identified with the functor associated to U_ i equipped with the quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_{U_ i}-algebra \mathcal{A}|_{U_ i}, by Lemma 27.4.1. Thus the result follows from Lemma 27.4.2.
Next we show that F_ i \subset F is representable by open immersions. Let (f : T \to S, \varphi ) \in F(T). Consider V_ i = f^{-1}(U_ i). It follows from the definition of F_ i that given a : T' \to T we gave a^*(f, \varphi ) \in F_ i(T') if and only if a(T') \subset V_ i. This is what we were required to show.
Finally, we have to show that the collection (F_ i)_{i \in I} covers F. Let (f : T \to S, \varphi ) \in F(T). Consider V_ i = f^{-1}(U_ i). Since S = \bigcup _{i \in I} U_ i is an open covering of S we see that T = \bigcup _{i \in I} V_ i is an open covering of T. Moreover (f, \varphi )|_{V_ i} \in F_ i(V_ i). This finishes the proof of the lemma. \square
Comments (0)
There are also: