The Stacks project

Lemma 29.32.15. Let $i : Z \to X$ be an immersion of schemes over $S$. There is a canonical exact sequence

\[ \mathcal{C}_{Z/X} \to i^*\Omega _{X/S} \to \Omega _{Z/S} \to 0 \]

where the first arrow is induced by $\text{d}_{X/S}$ and the second arrow comes from Lemma 29.32.8.

Proof. This is the sheafified version of Algebra, Lemma 10.131.9. However we should make sure we can define the first arrow globally. Hence we explain the meaning of “induced by $\text{d}_{X/S}$” here. Namely, we may assume that $i$ is a closed immersion by shrinking $X$. Let $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_ X$ be the sheaf of ideals corresponding to $Z \subset X$. Then $\text{d}_{X/S} : \mathcal{I} \to \Omega _{X/S}$ maps the subsheaf $\mathcal{I}^2 \subset \mathcal{I}$ to $\mathcal{I}\Omega _{X/S}$. Hence it induces a map $\mathcal{I}/\mathcal{I}^2 \to \Omega _{X/S}/\mathcal{I}\Omega _{X/S}$ which is $\mathcal{O}_ X/\mathcal{I}$-linear. By Lemma 29.4.1 this corresponds to a map $\mathcal{C}_{Z/X} \to i^*\Omega _{X/S}$ as desired. $\square$

Comments (3)

Comment #8579 by on

Suggested alternative proof:

We can assume that is a closed immersion by shrinking if necessary. Let be the ideal sheaf associated to . Consider the sequence Modules, Lemma 17.28.9, by setting equal to and , where is the structure morphism. Since is right exact, we can pull back along and get an exact sequence where in the second term we have used Modules, Lemma 17.16.4. Hence, the second term is . On the other hand, by Modules, Lemma 17.28.6, the third term equals where the last step is done using formula , for a ringed space, an ideal sheaf and an -module.

Comment #8580 by on

Okay, I forgot to justify the last claim from the statement in the alternative proof: one sees that the resulting pulled-back map equals (Lemma 29.32.8) by applying Modules, Lemma 17.28.13, taking and to be the morphisms of ringed spaces .

I'm not sure if any of this is any better the already existing proof. I just felt it was nice to connect Lemma 29.32 to the similar-looking Modules, Lemma 17.28.9.

Last thing: maybe one could make explicit in the statement that the maps are -linear.

Comment #9158 by on

Going to leave as is. There is obviously also some kind of version of this for just ringed spaces under suitable hypotheses.

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 29.32: Sheaf of differentials of a morphism

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 01UZ. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.