Proof.
Let A = \Gamma _*(X, \mathcal{L}) = \bigoplus _{d \geq 0} \Gamma (X, \mathcal{L}^{\otimes d}). By Properties, Proposition 28.26.13 the set of affine opens X_ a with a \in A_{+} homogeneous forms a basis for the topology of X. Hence we can find finitely many such elements a_0, \ldots , a_ n \in A_{+} such that
we have X = \bigcup _{i = 0, \ldots , n} X_{a_ i},
each X_{a_ i} is affine, and
each X_{a_ i} maps into an affine open V_ i \subset S.
By Lemma 29.15.2 we see that the ring maps \mathcal{O}_ S(V_ i) \to \mathcal{O}_ X(X_{a_ i}) are of finite type. Hence we can find finitely many elements f_{ij} \in \mathcal{O}_ X(X_{a_ i}), j = 1, \ldots , n_ i which generate \mathcal{O}_ X(X_{a_ i}) as an \mathcal{O}_ S(V_ i)-algebra. By Properties, Lemma 28.17.2 we may write each f_{ij} as a_{ij}/a_ i^{e_{ij}} for some a_{ij} \in A_{+} homogeneous. Let N be a positive integer which is a common multiple of all the degrees of the elements a_ i, a_{ij}. Consider the elements
a_ i^{N/\deg (a_ i)}, \ a_{ij}a_ i^{(N/\deg (a_ i)) - e_{ij}} \in A_ N.
By construction these generate the invertible sheaf \mathcal{L}^{\otimes N} over X. Hence they give rise to a morphism
j : X \longrightarrow \mathbf{P}_ S^{m} \quad \text{with } m = n + \sum n_ i
over S, see Constructions, Lemma 27.13.1 and Definition 27.13.2. Moreover, j^*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}_ S}(1) = \mathcal{L}^{\otimes N}. We name the homogeneous coordinates T_0, \ldots , T_ n, T_{ij} instead of T_0, \ldots , T_ m. For i = 0, \ldots , n we have i^{-1}(D_{+}(T_ i)) = X_{a_ i}. Moreover, pulling back the element T_{ij}/T_ i via j^\sharp we get the element f_{ij} \in \mathcal{O}_ X(X_{a_ i}). Hence the morphism j restricted to X_{a_ i} gives a closed immersion of X_{a_ i} into the affine open D_{+}(T_ i) \cap \mathbf{P}^ m_{V_ i} of \mathbf{P}^ N_ S. Hence we conclude that the morphism j is an immersion. This implies the lemma holds for some d and n which is enough in virtually all applications.
This proves that for one d_2 \geq 1 (namely d_2 = N above), some m \geq 0 there exists some immersion j : X \to \mathbf{P}^ m_ S given by global sections s'_0, \ldots , s'_ m \in \Gamma (X, \mathcal{L}^{\otimes d_2}). By Properties, Proposition 28.26.13 we know there exists an integer d_1 such that \mathcal{L}^{\otimes d} is globally generated for all d \geq d_1. Set d_0 = d_1 + d_2. We claim that the lemma holds with this value of d_0. Namely, given an integer d \geq d_0 we may choose s''_1, \ldots , s''_ t \in \Gamma (X, \mathcal{L}^{\otimes d - d_2}) which generate \mathcal{L}^{\otimes d - d_2} over X. Set k = (m + 1)t and denote s_0, \ldots , s_ k the collection of sections s'_\alpha s''_\beta , \alpha = 0, \ldots , m, \beta = 1, \ldots , t. These generate \mathcal{L}^{\otimes d} over X and therefore define a morphism
i : X \longrightarrow \mathbf{P}^{k - 1}_ S
such that i^*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^ n_ S}(1) \cong \mathcal{L}^{\otimes d}. To see that i is an immersion, observe that i is the composition
X \longrightarrow \mathbf{P}^ m_ S \times _ S \mathbf{P}^{t - 1}_ S \longrightarrow \mathbf{P}^{k - 1}_ S
where the first morphism is (j, j') with j' given by s''_1, \ldots , s''_ t and the second morphism is the Segre embedding (Constructions, Lemma 27.13.6). Since j is an immersion, so is (j, j') (apply Lemma 29.3.1 to X \to \mathbf{P}^ m_ S \times _ S \mathbf{P}^{t - 1}_ S \to \mathbf{P}^ m_ S). Thus i is a composition of immersions and hence an immersion (Schemes, Lemma 26.24.3).
\square
Comments (1)
Comment #9442 by Branislav Sobot on
There are also: