The Stacks project

109.52 Schemes, Final Exam, Spring 2009

These were the questions in the final exam of a course on Schemes, in the Spring of 2009 at Columbia University.

Exercise 109.52.1. Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent sheaf on $X$. Let $x \in X$ be a point. Assume that $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}) = \{ x \} $.

  1. Show that $x$ is a closed point of $X$.

  2. Show that $H^0(X, \mathcal{F})$ is not zero.

  3. Show that $\mathcal{F}$ is generated by global sections.

  4. Show that $H^ p(X, \mathcal{F}) = 0$ for $p > 0$.

Remark 109.52.2. Let $k$ be a field. Let $\mathbf{P}^2_ k = \text{Proj}(k[X_0, X_1, X_2])$. Any invertible sheaf on $\mathbf{P}^2_ k$ is isomorphic to $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_ k}(n)$ for some $n \in \mathbf{Z}$. Recall that

\[ \Gamma (\mathbf{P}^2_ k, \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_ k}(n)) = k[X_0, X_1, X_2]_ n \]

is the degree $n$ part of the polynomial ring. For a quasi-coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $\mathbf{P}^2_ k$ set $\mathcal{F}(n) = \mathcal{F} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_ k}} \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_ k}(n)$ as usual.

Exercise 109.52.3. Let $k$ be a field. Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a vector bundle on $\mathbf{P}^2_ k$, i.e., a finite locally free $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_ k}$-module. We say $\mathcal{E}$ is split if $\mathcal{E}$ is isomorphic to a direct sum invertible $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_ k}$-modules.

  1. Show that $\mathcal{E}$ is split if and only if $\mathcal{E}(n)$ is split.

  2. Show that if $\mathcal{E}$ is split then $H^1({\mathbf{P}^2_ k}, \mathcal{E}(n)) = 0$ for all $n \in \mathbf{Z}$.

  3. Let

    \[ \varphi : \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_ k} \longrightarrow \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_ k}(1) \oplus \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_ k}(1) \oplus \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_ k}(1) \]

    be given by linear forms $L_0, L_1, L_2 \in \Gamma (\mathbf{P}^2_ k, \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_ k}(1))$. Assume $L_ i \not= 0$ for some $i$. What is the condition on $L_0, L_1, L_2$ such that the cokernel of $\varphi $ is a vector bundle? Why?

  4. Given an example of such a $\varphi $.

  5. Show that $\mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(\varphi )$ is not split (if it is a vector bundle).

Remark 109.52.4. Freely use the following facts on dimension theory (and add more if you need more).

  1. The dimension of a scheme is the supremum of the length of chains of irreducible closed subsets.

  2. The dimension of a finite type scheme over a field is the maximum of the dimensions of its affine opens.

  3. The dimension of a Noetherian scheme is the maximum of the dimensions of its irreducible components.

  4. The dimension of an affine scheme coincides with the dimension of the corresponding ring.

  5. Let $k$ be a field and let $A$ be a finite type $k$-algebra. If $A$ is a domain, and $x \not= 0$, then $\dim (A) = \dim (A/xA) + 1$.

Exercise 109.52.5. Let $k$ be a field. Let $X$ be a projective, reduced scheme over $k$. Let $f : X \to \mathbf{P}^1_ k$ be a morphism of schemes over $k$. Assume there exists an integer $d \geq 0$ such that for every point $t \in \mathbf{P}^1_ k$ the fibre $X_ t = f^{-1}(t)$ is irreducible of dimension $d$. (Recall that an irreducible space is not empty.)

  1. Show that $\dim (X) = d + 1$.

  2. Let $X_0 \subset X$ be an irreducible component of $X$ of dimension $d + 1$. Prove that for every $t \in \mathbf{P}^1_ k$ the fibre $X_{0, t}$ has dimension $d$.

  3. What can you conclude about $X_ t$ and $X_{0, t}$ from the above?

  4. Show that $X$ is irreducible.

Remark 109.52.6. Given a projective scheme $X$ over a field $k$ and a coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ we set

\[ \chi (X, \mathcal{F}) = \sum \nolimits _{i \geq 0} (-1)^ i\dim _ k H^ i(X, \mathcal{F}). \]

Exercise 109.52.7. Let $k$ be a field. Write $\mathbf{P}^3_ k = \text{Proj}(k[X_0, X_1, X_2, X_3])$. Let $C \subset \mathbf{P}^3_ k$ be a type $(5, 6)$ complete intersection curve. This means that there exist $F \in k[X_0, X_1, X_2, X_3]_5$ and $G \in k[X_0, X_1, X_2, X_3]_6$ such that

\[ C = \text{Proj}(k[X_0, X_1, X_2, X_3]/(F, G)) \]

is a variety of dimension $1$. (Variety implies reduced and irreducible, but feel free to assume $C$ is nonsingular if you like.) Let $i : C \to \mathbf{P}^3_ k$ be the corresponding closed immersion. Being a complete intersection also implies that

\[ \xymatrix{ 0 \ar[r] & \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^3_ k}(-11) \ar[r]^-{ \left( \begin{matrix} -G \\ F \end{matrix} \right) } & \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^3_ k}(-5) \oplus \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^3_ k}(-6) \ar[r]^-{(F, G)} & \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^3_ k} \ar[r] & i_*\mathcal{O}_ C \ar[r] & 0 } \]

is an exact sequence of sheaves. Please use these facts to:

  1. compute $\chi (C, i^*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^3_ k}(n))$ for any $n \in \mathbf{Z}$, and

  2. compute the dimension of $H^1(C, \mathcal{O}_ C)$.

Exercise 109.52.8. Let $k$ be a field. Consider the rings

\begin{align*} A & = k[x, y]/(xy) \\ B & = k[u, v]/(uv) \\ C & = k[t, t^{-1}] \times k[s, s^{-1}] \end{align*}

and the $k$-algebra maps

\[ \begin{matrix} A \longrightarrow C, & x \mapsto (t, 0), & y \mapsto (0, s) \\ B \longrightarrow C, & u \mapsto (t^{-1}, 0), & v \mapsto (0, s^{-1}) \end{matrix} \]

It is a true fact that these maps induce isomorphisms $A_{x + y} \to C$ and $B_{u + v} \to C$. Hence the maps $A \to C$ and $B \to C$ identify $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(C)$ with open subsets of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ and $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B)$. Let $X$ be the scheme obtained by glueing $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ and $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B)$ along $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(C)$:

\[ X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \amalg _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(C)} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B). \]

As we saw in the course such a scheme exists and there are affine opens $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \subset X$ and $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B) \subset X$ whose overlap is exactly $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(C)$ identified with an open of each of these using the maps above.

  1. Why is $X$ separated?

  2. Why is $X$ of finite type over $k$?

  3. Compute $H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$, or what is its dimension?

  4. What is a more geometric way to describe $X$?

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 02AV. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.