Lemma 37.8.9. Let f : X \to S be a morphism of schemes. The following are equivalent:
The morphism f is étale, and
the morphism f is locally of finite presentation and formally étale.
Lemma 37.8.9. Let f : X \to S be a morphism of schemes. The following are equivalent:
The morphism f is étale, and
the morphism f is locally of finite presentation and formally étale.
Proof. Assume f is étale. An étale morphism is locally of finite presentation, flat and unramified, see Morphisms, Section 29.36. Hence f is locally of finite presentation and formally étale, see Lemma 37.8.7.
Conversely, suppose that f is locally of finite presentation and formally étale. Being étale is local in the Zariski topology on X and S, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.36.2. By Lemma 37.8.5 we can cover X by affine opens U which map into affine opens V such that U \to V is formally étale (and of finite presentation, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.21.2). By Lemma 37.8.8 we see that the ring maps \mathcal{O}(V) \to \mathcal{O}(U) are formally étale (and of finite presentation). We win by Algebra, Lemma 10.150.2. (We will give another proof of this implication when we discuss formally smooth morphisms.) \square
Comments (0)