Proof.
We first write (R \to S, M) as the directed colimit of a system (R_\lambda \to S_\lambda , M_\lambda ) as in as in Lemma 10.127.18. Let \mathfrak q \subset S be a prime. Let \mathfrak p \subset R, \mathfrak q_\lambda \subset S_\lambda , and \mathfrak p_\lambda \subset R_\lambda the corresponding primes. As seen in the proof of Theorem 10.129.4
((R_\lambda )_{\mathfrak p_\lambda }, (S_\lambda )_{\mathfrak q_\lambda }, (M_\lambda )_{\mathfrak q_{\lambda }})
is a system as in Lemma 10.127.13, and hence by Lemma 10.128.3 we see that for some \lambda _{\mathfrak q} \in \Lambda for all \lambda \geq \lambda _{\mathfrak q} the module M_\lambda is flat over R_\lambda at the prime \mathfrak q_{\lambda }.
By Theorem 10.129.4 we get an open subset U_\lambda \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S_\lambda ) such that M_\lambda flat over R_\lambda at all the primes of U_\lambda . Denote V_\lambda \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) the inverse image of U_\lambda under the map \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S_\lambda ). The argument above shows that for every \mathfrak q \in \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) there exists a \lambda _{\mathfrak q} such that \mathfrak q \in V_\lambda for all \lambda \geq \lambda _{\mathfrak q}. Since \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) is quasi-compact we see this implies there exists a single \lambda _0 \in \Lambda such that V_{\lambda _0} = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S).
The complement \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S_{\lambda _0}) \setminus U_{\lambda _0} is V(I) for some ideal I \subset S_{\lambda _0}. As V_{\lambda _0} = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) we see that IS = S. Choose f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in I and s_1, \ldots , s_ n \in S such that \sum f_ i s_ i = 1. Since \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits S_\lambda = S, after increasing \lambda _0 we may assume there exist s_{i, \lambda _0} \in S_{\lambda _0} such that \sum f_ i s_{i, \lambda _0} = 1. Hence for this \lambda _0 we have U_{\lambda _0} = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S_{\lambda _0}). This proves (1).
Proof of (2). Let (R_0 \to S_0, M_0) be as in (1) and suppose that R = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits R_\lambda . Since R_0 is a finite type \mathbf{Z} algebra, there exists a \lambda and a map R_0 \to R_\lambda such that R_0 \to R_\lambda \to R is the given map R_0 \to R (see Lemma 10.127.3). Then, part (2) follows by taking S_\lambda = R_\lambda \otimes _{R_0} S_0 and M_\lambda = S_\lambda \otimes _{S_0} M_0.
Finally, we come to the proof of (3). Let (R_\lambda \to S_\lambda , M_\lambda ) be as in (3). Choose (R_0 \to S_0, M_0) and R_0 \to R as in (1). As in the proof of (2), there exists a \lambda _0 and a ring map R_0 \to R_{\lambda _0} such that R_0 \to R_{\lambda _0} \to R is the given map R_0 \to R. Since S_0 is of finite presentation over R_0 and since S = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits S_\lambda we see that for some \lambda _1 \geq \lambda _0 we get an R_0-algebra map S_0 \to S_{\lambda _1} such that the composition S_0 \to S_{\lambda _1} \to S is the given map S_0 \to S (see Lemma 10.127.3). For all \lambda \geq \lambda _1 this gives maps
\Psi _{\lambda } : R_\lambda \otimes _{R_0} S_0 \longrightarrow R_\lambda \otimes _{R_{\lambda _1}} S_{\lambda _1} \cong S_\lambda
the last isomorphism by assumption. By construction \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _\lambda \Psi _\lambda is an isomorphism. Hence \Psi _\lambda is an isomorphism for all \lambda large enough by Lemma 10.127.8. In the same vein, there exists a \lambda _2 \geq \lambda _1 and an S_0-module map M_0 \to M_{\lambda _2} such that M_0 \to M_{\lambda _2} \to M is the given map M_0 \to M (see Lemma 10.127.5). For \lambda \geq \lambda _2 there is an induced map
S_\lambda \otimes _{S_0} M_0 \longrightarrow S_\lambda \otimes _{S_{\lambda _2}} M_{\lambda _2} \cong M_\lambda
and for \lambda large enough this map is an isomorphism by Lemma 10.127.6. This implies (3) because M_0 is flat over R_0.
\square
Comments (0)