Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 37.41.3. Let f : X \to S be a morphism of schemes. Let x_1, \ldots , x_ n \in X be points having the same image s in S. Assume that

  1. f is locally of finite type, and

  2. x_ i \in X_ s is isolated for i = 1, \ldots , n.

Then there exist

  1. an étale neighbourhood (U, u) \to (S, s),

  2. for each i an integer m_ i and open subschemes V_{i, j} \subset X_ U, j = 1, \ldots , m_ i

such that we have

  1. each V_{i, j} \to U is a finite morphism,

  2. there is a unique point v_{i, j} of V_{i, j} mapping to u in U with \kappa (u) \subset \kappa (v_{i, j}) finite purely inseparable,

  3. if v_{i, j} = v_{i', j'}, then i = i' and j = j', and

  4. the points v_{i, j} map to x_ i in X and no other points of (X_ U)_ u map to x_ i.

Proof. This proof is a variant of the proof of Algebra, Lemma 10.145.4 in the language of schemes. By Morphisms, Lemma 29.20.6 the morphism f is quasi-finite at each of the points x_ i. Hence \kappa (s) \subset \kappa (x_ i) is finite for each i (Morphisms, Lemma 29.20.5). For each i, let \kappa (s) \subset L_ i \subset \kappa (x_ i) be the subfield such that L_ i/\kappa (s) is separable, and \kappa (x_ i)/L_ i is purely inseparable. Choose a finite Galois extension L/\kappa (s) such that there exist \kappa (s)-embeddings L_ i \to L for i = 1, \ldots , n. Choose an étale neighbourhood (U, u) \to (S, s) such that L \cong \kappa (u) as \kappa (s)-extensions (Lemma 37.35.2).

Let y_{i, j}, j = 1, \ldots , m_ i be the points of X_ U lying over x_ i \in X and u \in U. By Schemes, Lemma 26.17.5 these points y_{i, j} correspond exactly to the primes in the rings \kappa (u) \otimes _{\kappa (s)} \kappa (x_ i). This also explains why there are finitely many; in fact m_ i = [L_ i : \kappa (s)] but we do not need this. By our choice of L (and elementary field theory) we see that \kappa (u) \subset \kappa (y_{i, j}) is finite purely inseparable for each pair i, j. Also, by Morphisms, Lemma 29.20.13 for example, the morphism X_ U \to U is quasi-finite at the points y_{i, j} for all i, j.

Apply Lemma 37.41.2 to the morphism X_ U \to U, the point u \in U and the points y_{i, j} \in (X_ U)_ u. This gives an étale neighbourhood (U', u') \to (U, u) with \kappa (u) = \kappa (u') and opens V_{i, j} \subset X_{U'} with the properties (i), (ii), and (iii) of that lemma. We claim that the étale neighbourhood (U', u') \to (S, s) and the opens V_{i, j} \subset X_{U'} are a solution to the problem posed by the lemma. We omit the verifications. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #2993 by Dan Dore on

The numbering in the Lemma says "(\romannumeral1)", etc. instead of "(i)", etc.

Comment #3116 by on

THis is a problem with the website and not with the latex.

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 37.41: Étale localization of quasi-finite morphisms

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.