Lemma 37.41.3. Let f : X \to S be a morphism of schemes. Let x_1, \ldots , x_ n \in X be points having the same image s in S. Assume that
f is locally of finite type, and
x_ i \in X_ s is isolated for i = 1, \ldots , n.
Then there exist
an étale neighbourhood (U, u) \to (S, s),
for each i an integer m_ i and open subschemes V_{i, j} \subset X_ U, j = 1, \ldots , m_ i
such that we have
each V_{i, j} \to U is a finite morphism,
there is a unique point v_{i, j} of V_{i, j} mapping to u in U with \kappa (u) \subset \kappa (v_{i, j}) finite purely inseparable,
if v_{i, j} = v_{i', j'}, then i = i' and j = j', and
the points v_{i, j} map to x_ i in X and no other points of (X_ U)_ u map to x_ i.
Proof.
This proof is a variant of the proof of Algebra, Lemma 10.145.4 in the language of schemes. By Morphisms, Lemma 29.20.6 the morphism f is quasi-finite at each of the points x_ i. Hence \kappa (s) \subset \kappa (x_ i) is finite for each i (Morphisms, Lemma 29.20.5). For each i, let \kappa (s) \subset L_ i \subset \kappa (x_ i) be the subfield such that L_ i/\kappa (s) is separable, and \kappa (x_ i)/L_ i is purely inseparable. Choose a finite Galois extension L/\kappa (s) such that there exist \kappa (s)-embeddings L_ i \to L for i = 1, \ldots , n. Choose an étale neighbourhood (U, u) \to (S, s) such that L \cong \kappa (u) as \kappa (s)-extensions (Lemma 37.35.2).
Let y_{i, j}, j = 1, \ldots , m_ i be the points of X_ U lying over x_ i \in X and u \in U. By Schemes, Lemma 26.17.5 these points y_{i, j} correspond exactly to the primes in the rings \kappa (u) \otimes _{\kappa (s)} \kappa (x_ i). This also explains why there are finitely many; in fact m_ i = [L_ i : \kappa (s)] but we do not need this. By our choice of L (and elementary field theory) we see that \kappa (u) \subset \kappa (y_{i, j}) is finite purely inseparable for each pair i, j. Also, by Morphisms, Lemma 29.20.13 for example, the morphism X_ U \to U is quasi-finite at the points y_{i, j} for all i, j.
Apply Lemma 37.41.2 to the morphism X_ U \to U, the point u \in U and the points y_{i, j} \in (X_ U)_ u. This gives an étale neighbourhood (U', u') \to (U, u) with \kappa (u) = \kappa (u') and opens V_{i, j} \subset X_{U'} with the properties (i), (ii), and (iii) of that lemma. We claim that the étale neighbourhood (U', u') \to (S, s) and the opens V_{i, j} \subset X_{U'} are a solution to the problem posed by the lemma. We omit the verifications.
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #2993 by Dan Dore on
Comment #3116 by Johan on
There are also: