The Stacks Project


Tag 02PI

Chapter 106: Obsolete > Section 106.19: Duplicate and split out references

Lemma 106.19.6. Let $R$ be a local ring.

  1. If $(M, N, \varphi, \psi)$ is a $2$-periodic complex such that $M$, $N$ have finite length. Then $e_R(M, N, \varphi, \psi) = \text{length}_R(M) - \text{length}_R(N)$.
  2. If $(M, \varphi, \psi)$ is a $(2, 1)$-periodic complex such that $M$ has finite length. Then $e_R(M, \varphi, \psi) = 0$.
  3. Suppose that we have a short exact sequence of $2$-periodic complexes $$ 0 \to (M_1, N_1, \varphi_1, \psi_1) \to (M_2, N_2, \varphi_2, \psi_2) \to (M_3, N_3, \varphi_3, \psi_3) \to 0 $$ If two out of three have cohomology modules of finite length so does the third and we have $$ e_R(M_2, N_2, \varphi_2, \psi_2) = e_R(M_1, N_1, \varphi_1, \psi_1) + e_R(M_3, N_3, \varphi_3, \psi_3). $$

Proof. This follows from Chow Homology, Lemmas 41.2.3 and 41.2.4. $\square$

    The code snippet corresponding to this tag is a part of the file obsolete.tex and is located in lines 2310–2336 (see updates for more information).

    \begin{lemma}
    \label{lemma-periodic-length}
    Let $R$ be a local ring.
    \begin{enumerate}
    \item If $(M, N, \varphi, \psi)$ is a $2$-periodic complex
    such that $M$, $N$ have finite length. Then
    $e_R(M, N, \varphi, \psi) = \text{length}_R(M) - \text{length}_R(N)$.
    \item If $(M, \varphi, \psi)$ is a $(2, 1)$-periodic complex
    such that $M$ has finite length. Then
    $e_R(M, \varphi, \psi) = 0$.
    \item Suppose that we have a short exact sequence of
    $2$-periodic complexes
    $$
    0 \to (M_1, N_1, \varphi_1, \psi_1)
    \to (M_2, N_2, \varphi_2, \psi_2)
    \to (M_3, N_3, \varphi_3, \psi_3)
    \to 0
    $$
    If two out of three have cohomology modules of finite length so does
    the third and we have
    $$
    e_R(M_2, N_2, \varphi_2, \psi_2) =
    e_R(M_1, N_1, \varphi_1, \psi_1) +
    e_R(M_3, N_3, \varphi_3, \psi_3).
    $$
    \end{enumerate}
    \end{lemma}
    
    \begin{proof}
    This follows from Chow Homology, Lemmas
    \ref{chow-lemma-additivity-periodic-length} and
    \ref{chow-lemma-finite-periodic-length}.
    \end{proof}

    Comments (2)

    Comment #2608 by Ko Aoki on June 24, 2017 a 6:02 am UTC

    Typo in the statement of (3): "$(2,1)$-periodic complexes" should be replaced by "$2$-periodic complexes."

    Comment #2631 by Johan (site) on July 7, 2017 a 12:48 pm UTC

    Thanks, fixed here.

    Add a comment on tag 02PI

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

    In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the lower-right corner).

    All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




    In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following box. So in case this where tag 0321 you just have to write 0321. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit 0.

    This captcha seems more appropriate than the usual illegible gibberish, right?