Definition 35.36.1. Let $\mathcal{P}$ be a property of morphisms of schemes over a base. Let $\tau \in \{ Zariski, fpqc, fppf, {\acute{e}tale}, smooth, syntomic\} $. We say *morphisms of type $\mathcal{P}$ satisfy descent for $\tau $-coverings* if for any $\tau $-covering $\mathcal{U} : \{ U_ i \to S\} _{i \in I}$ (see Topologies, Section 34.2), any descent datum $(X_ i, \varphi _{ij})$ relative to $\mathcal{U}$ such that each morphism $X_ i \to U_ i$ has property $\mathcal{P}$ is effective.

## 35.36 Descending types of morphisms

In the following we study the question as to whether descent data for schemes relative to a fpqc-covering are effective. The first remark to make is that this is not always the case. We will see this in Algebraic Spaces, Example 65.14.2. Even projective morphisms do not always satisfy descent for fpqc-coverings, by Examples, Lemma 110.65.1.

On the other hand, if the schemes we are trying to descend are particularly simple, then it is sometime the case that for whole classes of schemes descent data are effective. We will introduce terminology here that describes this phenomenon abstractly, even though it may lead to confusion if not used correctly later on.

Note that in each of the cases we have already seen that the functor from schemes over $S$ to descent data over $\mathcal{U}$ is fully faithful (Lemma 35.35.11 combined with the results in Topologies that any $\tau $-covering is also a fpqc-covering). We have also seen that descent data are always effective with respect to Zariski coverings (Lemma 35.35.10). It may be prudent to only study the notion just introduced when $\mathcal{P}$ is either stable under any base change or at least local on the base in the $\tau $-topology (see Definition 35.22.1) in order to avoid erroneous arguments (relying on $\mathcal{P}$ when descending halfway).

Here is the obligatory lemma reducing this question to the case of a covering given by a single morphism of affines.

Lemma 35.36.2. Let $\mathcal{P}$ be a property of morphisms of schemes over a base. Let $\tau \in \{ fpqc, fppf, {\acute{e}tale}, smooth, syntomic\} $. Suppose that

$\mathcal{P}$ is stable under any base change (see Schemes, Definition 26.18.3),

if $Y_ j \to V_ j$, $j = 1, \ldots , m$ have $\mathcal{P}$, then so does $\coprod Y_ j \to \coprod V_ j$, and

for any surjective morphism of affines $X \to S$ which is flat, flat of finite presentation, étale, smooth or syntomic depending on whether $\tau $ is fpqc, fppf, étale, smooth, or syntomic, any descent datum $(V, \varphi )$ relative to $X$ over $S$ such that $\mathcal{P}$ holds for $V \to X$ is effective.

Then morphisms of type $\mathcal{P}$ satisfy descent for $\tau $-coverings.

**Proof.**
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $\mathcal{U} = \{ \varphi _ i : U_ i \to S\} _{i \in I}$ be a $\tau $-covering of $S$. Let $(X_ i, \varphi _{ii'})$ be a descent datum relative to $\mathcal{U}$ and assume that each morphism $X_ i \to U_ i$ has property $\mathcal{P}$. We have to show there exists a scheme $X \to S$ such that $(X_ i, \varphi _{ii'}) \cong (U_ i \times _ S X, can)$.

Before we start the proof proper we remark that for any family of morphisms $\mathcal{V} : \{ V_ j \to S\} $ and any morphism of families $\mathcal{V} \to \mathcal{U}$, if we pullback the descent datum $(X_ i, \varphi _{ii'})$ to a descent datum $(Y_ j, \varphi _{jj'})$ over $\mathcal{V}$, then each of the morphisms $Y_ j \to V_ j$ has property $\mathcal{P}$ also. This is true because of assumption (1) that $\mathcal{P}$ is stable under any base change and the definition of pullback (see Definition 35.34.9). We will use this without further mention.

First, let us prove the lemma when $S$ is affine. By Topologies, Lemma 34.9.8, 34.7.4, 34.4.4, 34.5.4, or 34.6.4 there exists a standard $\tau $-covering $\mathcal{V} : \{ V_ j \to S\} _{j = 1, \ldots , m}$ which refines $\mathcal{U}$. The pullback functor $DD(\mathcal{U}) \to DD(\mathcal{V})$ between categories of descent data is fully faithful by Lemma 35.35.11. Hence it suffices to prove that the descent datum over the standard $\tau $-covering $\mathcal{V}$ is effective. By assumption (2) we see that $\coprod Y_ j \to \coprod V_ j$ has property $\mathcal{P}$. By Lemma 35.34.5 this reduces us to the covering $\{ \coprod _{j = 1, \ldots , m} V_ j \to S\} $ for which we have assumed the result in assumption (3) of the lemma. Hence the lemma holds when $S$ is affine.

Assume $S$ is general. Let $V \subset S$ be an affine open. By the properties of site the family $\mathcal{U}_ V = \{ V \times _ S U_ i \to V\} _{i \in I}$ is a $\tau $-covering of $V$. Denote $(X_ i, \varphi _{ii'})_ V$ the restriction (or pullback) of the given descent datum to $\mathcal{U}_ V$. Hence by what we just saw we obtain a scheme $X_ V$ over $V$ whose canonical descent datum with respect to $\mathcal{U}_ V$ is isomorphic to $(X_ i, \varphi _{ii'})_ V$. Suppose that $V' \subset V$ is an affine open of $V$. Then both $X_{V'}$ and $V' \times _ V X_ V$ have canonical descent data isomorphic to $(X_ i, \varphi _{ii'})_{V'}$. Hence, by Lemma 35.35.11 again we obtain a canonical morphism $\rho ^ V_{V'} : X_{V'} \to X_ V$ over $S$ which identifies $X_{V'}$ with the inverse image of $V'$ in $X_ V$. We omit the verification that given affine opens $V'' \subset V' \subset V$ of $S$ we have $\rho ^ V_{V''} = \rho ^ V_{V'} \circ \rho ^{V'}_{V''}$.

By Constructions, Lemma 27.2.1 the data $(X_ V, \rho ^ V_{V'})$ glue to a scheme $X \to S$. Moreover, we are given isomorphisms $V \times _ S X \to X_ V$ which recover the maps $\rho ^ V_{V'}$. Unwinding the construction of the schemes $X_ V$ we obtain isomorphisms

compatible with the maps $\varphi _{ii'}$ and compatible with restricting to smaller affine opens in $X$. This implies that the canonical descent datum on $U_ i \times _ S X$ is isomorphic to the given descent datum and we win. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)