Lemma 37.43.1. Let f : X \to S be a morphism of schemes. Assume f is of finite type and separated. Let S' be the normalization of S in X, see Morphisms, Definition 29.53.3. Picture:
\xymatrix{ X \ar[rd]_ f \ar[rr]_{f'} & & S' \ar[ld]^\nu \\ & S & }
Then there exists an open subscheme U' \subset S' such that
(f')^{-1}(U') \to U' is an isomorphism, and
(f')^{-1}(U') \subset X is the set of points at which f is quasi-finite.
Proof.
By Morphisms, Lemma 29.56.2 the subset U \subset X of points where f is quasi-finite is open. The lemma is equivalent to
U' = f'(U) \subset S' is open,
U = (f')^{-1}(U'), and
U \to U' is an isomorphism.
Let x \in U be arbitrary. We claim there exists an open neighbourhood f'(x) \in V \subset S' such that (f')^{-1}V \to V is an isomorphism. We first prove the claim implies the lemma. Namely, then (f')^{-1}V \cong V is both locally of finite type over S (as an open subscheme of X) and for v \in V the residue field extension \kappa (v)/\kappa (\nu (v)) is algebraic (as V \subset S' and S' is integral over S). Hence the fibres of V \to S are discrete (Morphisms, Lemma 29.20.2) and (f')^{-1}V \to S is locally quasi-finite (Morphisms, Lemma 29.20.8). This implies (f')^{-1}V \subset U and V \subset U'. Since x was arbitrary we see that (a), (b), and (c) are true.
Let s = f(x). Let (T, t) \to (S, s) be an elementary étale neighbourhood. Denote by a subscript {}_ T the base change to T. Let y = (x, t) \in X_ T be the unique point in the fibre X_ t lying over x. Note that U_ T \subset X_ T is the set of points where f_ T is quasi-finite, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.20.13. Note that
X_ T \xrightarrow {f'_ T} S'_ T \xrightarrow {\nu _ T} T
is the normalization of T in X_ T, see Lemma 37.19.2. Suppose that the claim holds for y \in U_ T \subset X_ T \to S'_ T \to T, i.e., suppose that we can find an open neighbourhood f'_ T(y) \in V' \subset S'_ T such that (f'_ T)^{-1}V' \to V' is an isomorphism. The morphism S'_ T \to S' is étale hence the image V \subset S' of V' is open. Observe that f'(x) \in V as f'_ T(y) \in V'. Observe that
\xymatrix{ (f'_ T)^{-1}V' \ar[r] \ar[d] & (f')^{-1}(V) \ar[d] \\ V' \ar[r] & V }
is a fibre square (as S'_ T \times _{S'} X = X_ T). Since the left vertical arrow is an isomorphism and \{ V' \to V\} is a étale covering, we conclude that the right vertical arrow is an isomorphism by Descent, Lemma 35.23.17. In other words, the claim holds for x \in U \subset X \to S' \to S.
By the result of the previous paragraph we may replace S by an elementary étale neighbourhood of s = f(x) in order to prove the claim. Thus we may assume there is a decomposition
X = V \amalg W
into open and closed subschemes where V \to S is finite and x \in V, see Lemma 37.41.4. Since X is a disjoint union of V and W over S and since V \to S is finite we see that the normalization of S in X is the morphism
X = V \amalg W \longrightarrow V \amalg W' \longrightarrow S
where W' is the normalization of S in W, see Morphisms, Lemmas 29.53.10, 29.44.4, and 29.53.12. The claim follows and we win.
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #7352 by Yijin Wang on
Comment #7570 by Stacks Project on
There are also: