The Stacks project

73.3 Zariski topology

In Spaces, Section 65.12 we introduced the notion of a Zariski covering of an algebraic space by open subspaces. Here is the corresponding notion with open subspaces replaced by open immersions.

Definition 73.3.1. Let $S$ be a scheme, and let $X$ be an algebraic space over $S$. A Zariski covering of $X$ is a family of morphisms $\{ f_ i : X_ i \to X\} _{i \in I}$ of algebraic spaces over $S$ such that each $f_ i$ is an open immersion and such that

\[ |X| = \bigcup \nolimits _{i \in I} |f_ i|(|X_ i|), \]

i.e., the morphisms are jointly surjective.

Although Zariski coverings are occasionally useful the corresponding topology on the category of algebraic spaces is really too coarse, and not particularly useful. Still, it does define a site.

Lemma 73.3.2. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be an algebraic space over $S$.

  1. If $X' \to X$ is an isomorphism then $\{ X' \to X\} $ is a Zariski covering of $X$.

  2. If $\{ X_ i \to X\} _{i\in I}$ is a Zariski covering and for each $i$ we have a Zariski covering $\{ X_{ij} \to X_ i\} _{j\in J_ i}$, then $\{ X_{ij} \to X\} _{i \in I, j\in J_ i}$ is a Zariski covering.

  3. If $\{ X_ i \to X\} _{i\in I}$ is a Zariski covering and $X' \to X$ is a morphism of algebraic spaces then $\{ X' \times _ X X_ i \to X'\} _{i\in I}$ is a Zariski covering.

Proof. Omitted. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 03YD. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.