78.20 Quotient stacks
In this section and the next few sections we describe a kind of generalization of Section 78.19 above and Groupoids, Section 39.20. It is different in the following way: We are going to take quotient stacks instead of quotient sheaves.
Let us assume we have a scheme S, and algebraic space B over S and a groupoid in algebraic spaces (U, R, s, t, c) over B. Given these data we consider the functor
78.20.0.1
\begin{equation} \label{spaces-groupoids-equation-quotient-stack} \begin{matrix} (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}^{opp}
& \longrightarrow
& \textit{Groupoids}
\\ S'
& \longmapsto
& (U(S'), R(S'), s, t, c)
\end{matrix} \end{equation}
By Categories, Example 4.37.1 this “presheaf in groupoids” corresponds to a category fibred in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. In this chapter we will denote this
[U/_{\! p}R] \to (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}
where the subscript {}_ p is there to distinguish from the quotient stack.
Definition 78.20.1. Quotient stacks. Let B \to S be as above.
Let (U, R, s, t, c) be a groupoid in algebraic spaces over B. The quotient stack
p : [U/R] \longrightarrow (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}
of (U, R, s, t, c) is the stackification (see Stacks, Lemma 8.9.1) of the category fibred in groupoids [U/_{\! p}R] over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} associated to (78.20.0.1).
Let (G, m) be a group algebraic space over B. Let a : G \times _ B X \to X be an action of G on an algebraic space over B. The quotient stack
p : [X/G] \longrightarrow (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}
is the quotient stack associated to the groupoid in algebraic spaces (X, G \times _ B X, s, t, c) over B of Lemma 78.15.1.
Thus [U/R] and [X/G] are stacks in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. These stacks will be very important later on and hence it makes sense to give a detailed description. Recall that given an algebraic space X over S we use the notation \mathcal{S}_ X \to (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} to denote the stack in sets associated to the sheaf X, see Categories, Lemma 4.38.6 and Stacks, Lemma 8.6.2.
Lemma 78.20.2. Assume B \to S and (U, R, s, t, c) as in Definition 78.20.1 (1). There are canonical 1-morphisms \pi : \mathcal{S}_ U \to [U/R], and [U/R] \to \mathcal{S}_ B of stacks in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. The composition \mathcal{S}_ U \to \mathcal{S}_ B is the 1-morphism associated to the structure morphism U \to B.
Proof.
During this proof let us denote [U/_{\! p}R] the category fibred in groupoids associated to the presheaf in groupoids (78.20.0.1). By construction of the stackification there is a 1-morphism [U/_{\! p}R] \to [U/R]. The 1-morphism \mathcal{S}_ U \to [U/R] is simply the composition \mathcal{S}_ U \to [U/_{\! p}R] \to [U/R], where the first arrow associates to the scheme S'/S and morphism x : S' \to U over S the object x \in U(S') of the fibre category of [U/_{\! p}R] over S'.
To construct the 1-morphism [U/R] \to \mathcal{S}_ B it is enough to construct the 1-morphism [U/_{\! p}R] \to \mathcal{S}_ B, see Stacks, Lemma 8.9.2. On objects over S'/S we just use the map
U(S') \longrightarrow B(S')
coming from the structure morphism U \to B. And clearly, if a \in R(S') is an “arrow” with source s(a) \in U(S') and target t(a) \in U(S'), then since s and t are morphisms over B these both map to the same element \overline{a} of B(S'). Hence we can map an arrow a \in R(S') to the identity morphism of \overline{a}. (This is good because the fibre category (\mathcal{S}_ B)_{S'} only contains identities.) We omit the verification that this rule is compatible with pullback on these split fibred categories, and hence defines a 1-morphism [U/_{\! p}R] \to \mathcal{S}_ B as desired.
We omit the verification of the last statement.
\square
Lemma 78.20.3. Assumptions and notation as in Lemma 78.20.2. There exists a canonical 2-morphism \alpha : \pi \circ s \to \pi \circ t making the diagram
\xymatrix{ \mathcal{S}_ R \ar[r]_ s \ar[d]_ t & \mathcal{S}_ U \ar[d]^\pi \\ \mathcal{S}_ U \ar[r]^-\pi & [U/R] }
2-commutative.
Proof.
Let S' be a scheme over S. Let r : S' \to R be a morphism over S. Then r \in R(S') is an isomorphism between the objects s \circ r, t \circ r \in U(S'). Moreover, this construction is compatible with pullbacks. This gives a canonical 2-morphism \alpha _ p : \pi _ p \circ s \to \pi _ p \circ t where \pi _ p : \mathcal{S}_ U \to [U/_{\! p}R] is as in the proof of Lemma 78.20.2. Thus even the diagram
\xymatrix{ \mathcal{S}_ R \ar[r]_ s \ar[d]^ t & \mathcal{S}_ U \ar[d]^{\pi _ p} \\ \mathcal{S}_ U \ar[r]^-{\pi _ p} & [U/_{\! p}R] }
is 2-commutative. Thus a fortiori the diagram of the lemma is 2-commutative.
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #1812 by OS on
Comment #1830 by Johan on