80.5 Bootstrapping the diagonal
In this section we prove that the diagonal of a sheaf F on (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} is representable as soon as there exists an “fppf cover” of F by a scheme or by an algebraic space, see Lemma 80.5.3.
Lemma 80.5.1.slogan Let S be a scheme. If F is a presheaf on (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. The following are equivalent:
\Delta _ F : F \to F \times F is representable by algebraic spaces,
for every scheme T any map T \to F is representable by algebraic spaces, and
for every algebraic space X any map X \to F is representable by algebraic spaces.
Proof.
Assume (1). Let X \to F be as in (3). Let T be a scheme, and let T \to F be a morphism. Then we have
T \times _ F X = (T \times _ S X) \times _{F \times F, \Delta } F
which is an algebraic space by Lemma 80.3.7 and (1). Hence X \to F is representable, i.e., (3) holds. The implication (3) \Rightarrow (2) is trivial. Assume (2). Let T be a scheme, and let (a, b) : T \to F \times F be a morphism. Then
F \times _{\Delta _ F, F \times F} T = (T \times _{a, F, b} T) \times _{T \times T, \Delta _ T} T
which is an algebraic space by assumption. Hence \Delta _ F is representable by algebraic spaces, i.e., (1) holds.
\square
In particular if F is a presheaf satisfying the equivalent conditions of the lemma, then for any morphism X \to F where X is an algebraic space it makes sense to say that X \to F is surjective (resp. étale, flat, locally of finite presentation) by using Definition 80.4.1.
Before we actually do the bootstrap we prove a fun lemma.
Lemma 80.5.2. Let S be a scheme. Let
\xymatrix{ E \ar[r]_ a \ar[d]_ f & F \ar[d]^ g \\ H \ar[r]^ b & G }
be a cartesian diagram of sheaves on (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}, so E = H \times _ G F. If
g is representable by algebraic spaces, surjective, flat, and locally of finite presentation, and
a is representable by algebraic spaces, separated, and locally quasi-finite
then b is representable (by schemes) as well as separated and locally quasi-finite.
Proof.
Let T be a scheme, and let T \to G be a morphism. We have to show that T \times _ G H is a scheme, and that the morphism T \times _ G H \to T is separated and locally quasi-finite. Thus we may base change the whole diagram to T and assume that G is a scheme. In this case F is an algebraic space. Let U be a scheme, and let U \to F be a surjective étale morphism. Then U \to F is representable, surjective, flat and locally of finite presentation by Morphisms of Spaces, Lemmas 67.39.7 and 67.39.8. By Lemma 80.3.8 U \to G is surjective, flat and locally of finite presentation also. Note that the base change E \times _ F U \to U of a is still separated and locally quasi-finite (by Lemma 80.4.2). Hence we may replace the upper part of the diagram of the lemma by E \times _ F U \to U. In other words, we may assume that F \to G is a surjective, flat morphism of schemes which is locally of finite presentation. In particular, \{ F \to G\} is an fppf covering of schemes. By Morphisms of Spaces, Proposition 67.50.2 we conclude that E is a scheme also. By Descent, Lemma 35.39.1 the fact that E = H \times _ G F means that we get a descent datum on E relative to the fppf covering \{ F \to G\} . By More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.57.1 this descent datum is effective. By Descent, Lemma 35.39.1 again this implies that H is a scheme. By Descent, Lemmas 35.23.6 and 35.23.24 it now follows that b is separated and locally quasi-finite.
\square
Here is the result that the section title refers to.
Lemma 80.5.3. Let S be a scheme. Let F : (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}^{opp} \to \textit{Sets} be a functor. Assume that
the presheaf F is a sheaf,
there exists an algebraic space X and a map X \to F which is representable by algebraic spaces, surjective, flat and locally of finite presentation.
Then \Delta _ F is representable (by schemes).
Proof.
Let U \to X be a surjective étale morphism from a scheme towards X. Then U \to X is representable, surjective, flat and locally of finite presentation by Morphisms of Spaces, Lemmas 67.39.7 and 67.39.8. By Lemma 80.4.3 the composition U \to F is representable by algebraic spaces, surjective, flat and locally of finite presentation also. Thus we see that R = U \times _ F U is an algebraic space, see Lemma 80.3.7. The morphism of algebraic spaces R \to U \times _ S U is a monomorphism, hence separated (as the diagonal of a monomorphism is an isomorphism, see Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.10.2). Since U \to F is locally of finite presentation, both morphisms R \to U are locally of finite presentation, see Lemma 80.4.2. Hence R \to U \times _ S U is locally of finite type (use Morphisms of Spaces, Lemmas 67.28.5 and 67.23.6). Altogether this means that R \to U \times _ S U is a monomorphism which is locally of finite type, hence a separated and locally quasi-finite morphism, see Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.27.10.
Now we are ready to prove that \Delta _ F is representable. Let T be a scheme, and let (a, b) : T \to F \times F be a morphism. Set
T' = (U \times _ S U) \times _{F \times F} T.
Note that U \times _ S U \to F \times F is representable by algebraic spaces, surjective, flat and locally of finite presentation by Lemma 80.4.4. Hence T' is an algebraic space, and the projection morphism T' \to T is surjective, flat, and locally of finite presentation. Consider Z = T \times _{F \times F} F (this is a sheaf) and
Z' = T' \times _{U \times _ S U} R = T' \times _ T Z.
We see that Z' is an algebraic space, and Z' \to T' is separated and locally quasi-finite by the discussion in the first paragraph of the proof which showed that R is an algebraic space and that the morphism R \to U \times _ S U has those properties. Hence we may apply Lemma 80.5.2 to the diagram
\xymatrix{ Z' \ar[r] \ar[d] & T' \ar[d] \\ Z \ar[r] & T }
and we conclude.
\square
Here is a variant of the result above.
Lemma 80.5.4. Let S be a scheme. Let F : (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}^{opp} \to \textit{Sets} be a functor. Let X be a scheme and let X \to F be representable by algebraic spaces and locally quasi-finite. Then X \to F is representable (by schemes).
Proof.
Let T be a scheme and let T \to F be a morphism. We have to show that the algebraic space X \times _ F T is representable by a scheme. Consider the morphism
X \times _ F T \longrightarrow X \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z})} T
Since X \times _ F T \to T is locally quasi-finite, so is the displayed arrow (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.27.8). On the other hand, the displayed arrow is a monomorphism and hence separated (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.10.3). Thus X \times _ F T is a scheme by Morphisms of Spaces, Proposition 67.50.2.
\square
Comments (0)