Definition 4.16.1. We say that a category \mathcal{I} is connected if the equivalence relation generated by x \sim y \Leftrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {I}(x, y) \not= \emptyset has exactly one equivalence class.
4.16 Connected limits
A (co)limit is called connected if its index category is connected.
Here we follow the convention of Topology, Definition 5.7.1 that connected spaces are nonempty. The following in some vague sense characterizes connected limits.
Lemma 4.16.2. Let \mathcal{C} be a category. Let X be an object of \mathcal{C}. Let M : \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{C}/X be a diagram in the category of objects over X. If the index category \mathcal{I} is connected and the limit of M exists in \mathcal{C}/X, then the limit of the composition \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{C}/X \to \mathcal{C} exists and is the same.
Proof. Let L \to X be an object representing the limit in \mathcal{C}/X. Consider the functor
Let (\varphi _ i) be an element of the set on the right. Since each M_ i comes equipped with a morphism s_ i : M_ i \to X we get morphisms f_ i = s_ i \circ \varphi _ i : W \to X. But as \mathcal{I} is connected we see that all f_ i are equal. Since \mathcal{I} is nonempty there is at least one f_ i. Hence this common value W \to X defines the structure of an object of W in \mathcal{C}/X and (\varphi _ i) defines an element of \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathcal{C}/X}(W, M_ i). Thus we obtain a unique morphism \phi : W \to L such that \varphi _ i is the composition of \phi with L \to M_ i as desired. \square
Lemma 4.16.3. Let \mathcal{C} be a category. Let X be an object of \mathcal{C}. Let M : \mathcal{I} \to X/\mathcal{C} be a diagram in the category of objects under X. If the index category \mathcal{I} is connected and the colimit of M exists in X/\mathcal{C}, then the colimit of the composition \mathcal{I} \to X/\mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{C} exists and is the same.
Proof. Omitted. Hint: This lemma is dual to Lemma 4.16.2. \square
Comments (2)
Comment #7160 by Jazengm on
Comment #7162 by Johan on