## 4.16 Connected limits

A (co)limit is called connected if its index category is connected.

Definition 4.16.1. We say that a category $\mathcal{I}$ is connected if the equivalence relation generated by $x \sim y \Leftrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {I}(x, y) \not= \emptyset$ has exactly one equivalence class.

Here we follow the convention of Topology, Definition 5.7.1 that connected spaces are nonempty. The following in some vague sense characterizes connected limits.

Lemma 4.16.2. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category. Let $X$ be an object of $\mathcal{C}$. Let $M : \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{C}/X$ be a diagram in the category of objects over $X$. If the index category $\mathcal{I}$ is connected and the limit of $M$ exists in $\mathcal{C}/X$, then the limit of the composition $\mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{C}/X \to \mathcal{C}$ exists and is the same.

Proof. Let $L \to X$ be an object representing the limit in $\mathcal{C}/X$. Consider the functor

$W \longmapsto \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(W, M_ i).$

Let $(\varphi _ i)$ be an element of the set on the right. Since each $M_ i$ comes equipped with a morphism $s_ i : M_ i \to X$ we get morphisms $f_ i = s_ i \circ \varphi _ i : W \to X$. But as $\mathcal{I}$ is connected we see that all $f_ i$ are equal. Since $\mathcal{I}$ is nonempty there is at least one $f_ i$. Hence this common value $W \to X$ defines the structure of an object of $W$ in $\mathcal{C}/X$ and $(\varphi _ i)$ defines an element of $\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathcal{C}/X}(W, M_ i)$. Thus we obtain a unique morphism $\phi : W \to L$ such that $\varphi _ i$ is the composition of $\phi$ with $L \to M_ i$ as desired. $\square$

Lemma 4.16.3. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category. Let $X$ be an object of $\mathcal{C}$. Let $M : \mathcal{I} \to X/\mathcal{C}$ be a diagram in the category of objects under $X$. If the index category $\mathcal{I}$ is connected and the colimit of $M$ exists in $X/\mathcal{C}$, then the colimit of the composition $\mathcal{I} \to X/\mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{C}$ exists and is the same.

Proof. Omitted. Hint: This lemma is dual to Lemma 4.16.2. $\square$

Comment #7160 by Jazengm on

I think we should add "or $\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {I}(y, x) \not= \emptyset$" to the definition to the equivalence relation?

Comment #7162 by on

We could but we don't have to. Namely, if $S$ is a set , then the "equivalence relation generated by $\Omega \subset S \times S$" means smallest equivalence relation $R \subset S \times S$ containing $\Omega$. In particular $R$ will contain both $\Omega$ and $\Omega$ flipped.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).