Lemma 79.15.7 (Existence of quasi-splitting). In Situation 79.15.4 there exists an algebraic space U', an étale morphism U' \to U, and a point u' : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (u)) \to U' lying over u : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (u)) \to U such that the restriction R' = R|_{U'} of R to U' is quasi-split over u'.
Proof. Let f : (U', Z_{univ}, s', t', c') \to (U, R, s, t, c) be as constructed in Lemma 79.14.1. Recall that R' = R \times _{(U \times _ S U)} (U' \times _ S U'). Thus we get a morphism (f, t', s') : Z_{univ} \to R' of groupoids in algebraic spaces
(by abuse of notation we indicate the morphisms in the two groupoids by the same symbols). Now, as Z_{univ} \subset R \times _{s, U, g} U' is open and R' \to R \times _{s, U, g} U' is étale (as a base change of U' \to U) we see that Z_{univ} \to R' is an open immersion. By construction the morphisms s', t' : Z_{univ} \to U' are finite. It remains to find the point u' of U'.
We think of u as a morphism \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (u)) \to U as in the statement of the lemma. Set F_ u = R \times _{s, U} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (u)). The morphism F_ u \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (u)) is quasi-finite at e(u) by assumption. Hence we can find a decomposition into open and closed subschemes
for some scheme Z_ u finite over \kappa (u) whose support is e(u). Hence by the construction of U' in Section 79.14 (u, Z_ u) defines a \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (u))-valued point u' of U'. To finish the proof we have to show that e'(u') \in Z_{univ} which is clear. \square
Comments (0)