The Stacks project

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

15.21 Descent of flatness along integral maps

First a few simple lemmas.

Lemma 15.21.1. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $P(T)$ be a monic polynomial with coefficients in $R$. Let $\alpha \in R$ be such that $P(\alpha ) = 0$. Then $P(T) = (T - \alpha )Q(T)$ for some monic polynomial $Q(T) \in R[T]$.

Proof. By induction on the degree of $P$. If $\deg (P) = 1$, then $P(T) = T - \alpha $ and the result is true. If $\deg (P) > 1$, then we can write $P(T) = (T - \alpha )Q(T) + r$ for some polynomial $Q \in R[T]$ of degree $< \deg (P)$ and some $r \in R$ by long division. By assumption $0 = P(\alpha ) = (\alpha - \alpha )Q(\alpha ) + r = r$ and we conclude that $r = 0$ as desired. $\square$

Lemma 15.21.2. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $P(T)$ be a monic polynomial with coefficients in $R$. There exists a finite free ring map $R \to R'$ such that $P(T) = (T - \alpha )Q(T)$ for some $\alpha \in R'$ and some monic polynomial $Q(T) \in R'[T]$.

Proof. Write $P(T) = T^ d + a_1T^{d - 1} + \ldots + a_0$. Set $R' = R[x]/(x^ d + a_1x^{d - 1} + \ldots + a_0)$. Set $\alpha $ equal to the congruence class of $x$. Then it is clear that $P(\alpha ) = 0$. Thus we win by Lemma 15.21.1. $\square$

Lemma 15.21.3. Let $R \to S$ be a finite ring map. There exists a finite free ring extension $R \subset R'$ such that $S \otimes _ R R'$ is a quotient of a ring of the form

\[ R'[T_1, \ldots , T_ n]/(P_1(T_1), \ldots , P_ n(T_ n)) \]

with $P_ i(T) = \prod _{j = 1, \ldots , d_ i} (T - \alpha _{ij})$ for some $\alpha _{ij} \in R'$.

Proof. Let $x_1, \ldots , x_ n \in S$ be generators of $S$ over $R$. For each $i$ we can choose a monic polynomial $P_ i(T) \in R[T]$ such that $P(x_ i) = 0$ in $S$, see Algebra, Lemma 10.35.3. Say $\deg (P_ i) = d_ i$. By Lemma 15.21.2 (applied $\sum d_ i$ times) there exists a finite free ring extension $R \subset R'$ such that each $P_ i$ splits completely:

\[ P_ i(T) = \prod \nolimits _{j = 1, \ldots , d_ i} (T - \alpha _{ij}) \]

for certain $\alpha _{ik} \in R'$. Let $R'[T_1, \ldots , T_ n] \to S \otimes _ R R'$ be the $R'$-algebra map which maps $T_ i$ to $x_ i \otimes 1$. As this maps $P_ i(T_ i)$ to zero, this induces the desired surjection. $\square$

Lemma 15.21.4. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $S = R[T_1, \ldots , T_ n]/J$. Assume $J$ contains elements of the form $P_ i(T_ i)$ with $P_ i(T) = \prod _{j = 1, \ldots , d_ i} (T - \alpha _{ij})$ for some $\alpha _{ij} \in R$. For $\underline{k} = (k_1, \ldots , k_ n)$ with $1 \leq k_ i \leq d_ i$ consider the ring map

\[ \Phi _{\underline{k}} : R[T_1, \ldots , T_ n] \to R, \quad T_ i \longmapsto \alpha _{ik_ i} \]

Set $J_{\underline{k}} = \Phi _{\underline{k}}(J)$. Then the image of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ is equal to $V(\bigcap J_{\underline{k}})$.

Proof. This lemma proves itself. Hint: $V(\bigcap J_{\underline{k}}) = \bigcup V(J_{\underline{k}})$. $\square$

The following result is due to Ferrand, see [Ferrand].

Lemma 15.21.5. Let $R \to S$ be a finite injective homomorphism of Noetherian rings. Let $M$ be an $R$-module. If $M \otimes _ R S$ is a flat $S$-module, then $M$ is a flat $R$-module.

Proof. Let $M$ be an $R$-module such that $M \otimes _ R S$ is flat over $S$. By Algebra, Lemma 10.38.8 in order to prove that $M$ is flat we may replace $R$ by any faithfully flat ring extension. By Lemma 15.21.3 we can find a finite locally free ring extension $R \subset R'$ such that $S' = S \otimes _ R R' = R'[T_1, \ldots , T_ n]/J$ for some ideal $J \subset R'[T_1, \ldots , T_ n]$ which contains the elements of the form $P_ i(T_ i)$ with $P_ i(T) = \prod _{j = 1, \ldots , d_ i} (T - \alpha _{ij})$ for some $\alpha _{ij} \in R'$. Note that $R'$ is Noetherian and that $R' \subset S'$ is a finite extension of rings. Hence we may replace $R$ by $R'$ and assume that $S$ has a presentation as in Lemma 15.21.4. Note that $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ is surjective, see Algebra, Lemma 10.35.17. Thus, using Lemma 15.21.4 we conclude that $I = \bigcap J_{\underline{k}}$ is an ideal such that $V(I) = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$. This means that $I \subset \sqrt{(0)}$, and since $R$ is Noetherian that $I$ is nilpotent. The maps $\Phi _{\underline{k}}$ induce commutative diagrams

\[ \xymatrix{ S \ar[rr] & & R/J_{\underline{k}} \\ & R \ar[lu] \ar[ru] } \]

from which we conclude that $M/J_{\underline{k}}M$ is flat over $R/J_{\underline{k}}$. By Lemma 15.16.1 we see that $M/IM$ is flat over $R/I$. Finally, applying Algebra, Lemma 10.100.5 we conclude that $M$ is flat over $R$. $\square$

Lemma 15.21.6. Let $R \to S$ be an injective integral ring map. Let $M$ be a finitely presented module over $R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]$. If $M \otimes _ R S$ is flat over $S$, then $M$ is flat over $R$.

Proof. Choose a presentation

\[ R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]^{\oplus t} \to R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]^{\oplus r} \to M \to 0. \]

Let's say that the first map is given by the $r \times t$-matrix $T = (f_{ij})$ with $f_{ij} \in R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]$. Write $f_{ij} = \sum f_{ij, I} x^ I$ with $f_{ij, I} \in R$ (multi-index notation). Consider diagrams

\[ \xymatrix{ R \ar[r] & S \\ R_\lambda \ar[u] \ar[r] & S_\lambda \ar[u] } \]

where $R_\lambda $ is a finitely generated $\mathbf{Z}$-subalgebra of $R$ containing all $f_{ij, I}$ and $S_\lambda $ is a finite $R_\lambda $-subalgebra of $S$. Let $M_\lambda $ be the finite $R_\lambda [x_1, \ldots , x_ n]$-module defined by a presentation as above, using the same matrix $T$ but now viewed as a matrix over $R_\lambda [x_1, \ldots , x_ n]$. Note that $S$ is the directed colimit of the $S_\lambda $ (details omitted). By Algebra, Lemma 10.162.1 we see that for some $\lambda $ the module $M_\lambda \otimes _{R_\lambda } S_\lambda $ is flat over $S_\lambda $. By Lemma 15.21.5 we conclude that $M_\lambda $ is flat over $R_\lambda $. Since $M = M_\lambda \otimes _{R_\lambda } R$ we win by Algebra, Lemma 10.38.7. $\square$


Comments (2)

Comment #3555 by Laurent Moret-Bailly on

Shouldn't the title be "Descent of flatness..."?


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 052Y. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.