Lemma 37.26.5. Let f : X \to Y be a morphism which is quasi-compact and locally of finite presentation. Then the set
is locally constructible in Y.
Lemma 37.26.5. Let f : X \to Y be a morphism which is quasi-compact and locally of finite presentation. Then the set
is locally constructible in Y.
Proof. Let y \in Y. We have to show that there exists an open neighbourhood V of y in Y such that E \cap V is constructible in V. Thus we may assume that Y is affine. Then X is quasi-compact. Choose a finite affine open covering X = U_1 \cup \ldots \cup U_ n. Then the fibres of U_ i \to Y at y form an affine open covering of the fibre of X \to Y at y. Hence we may assume X is affine as well. Write Y = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A). Write A = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits A_ i as a directed limit of finite type \mathbf{Z}-algebras. By Limits, Lemma 32.10.1 we can find an i and a morphism f_ i : X_ i \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_ i) of finite presentation whose base change to Y recovers f. By Lemma 37.26.2 it suffices to prove the lemma for f_ i. Thus we reduce to the case where Y is the spectrum of a Noetherian ring.
We will use the criterion of Topology, Lemma 5.16.3 to prove that E is constructible in case Y is a Noetherian scheme. To see this let Z \subset Y be an irreducible closed subscheme with generic point \xi . We have to show that E \cap Z either contains a nonempty open subset or is not dense in Z. If X_\xi is geometrically reduced, then Lemma 37.26.4 (applied to the morphism X_ Z \to Z) implies that all fibres X_ y are geometrically reduced for a nonempty open V \subset Z. If X_\xi is not geometrically reduced, then Lemma 37.26.3 (applied to the morphism X_ Z \to Z) implies that all fibres X_ y are not geometrically reduced for a nonempty open V \subset Z. Thus we win. \square
Comments (2)
Comment #10525 by ZL on
Comment #10686 by Stacks Project on