Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 37.25.3. Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of schemes. Let \mathcal{F} be a quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-module. Let U \subset X be an open subscheme. Assume

  1. f is of finite type,

  2. \mathcal{F} is of finite type,

  3. Y is irreducible with generic point \eta , and

  4. \text{Ass}_{X_\eta }(\mathcal{F}_\eta ) \subset U_\eta .

Then there exists a nonempty open subscheme V \subset Y such that for all y \in V we have \text{Ass}_{X_ y}(\mathcal{F}_ y) \subset U_ y.

Proof. (This proof is the same as the proof of Lemma 37.24.4. We urge the reader to read that proof first.) Since the statement is about fibres it is clear that we may replace Y by its reduction. Hence we may assume that Y is integral, see Properties, Lemma 28.3.4. We may also assume that Y = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) is affine. Then A is a domain with fraction field K.

As f is of finite type we see that X is quasi-compact. Write X = X_1 \cup \ldots \cup X_ n for some affine opens X_ i and set \mathcal{F}_ i = \mathcal{F}|_{X_ i}. By assumption the generic fibre of U_ i = X_ i \cap U contains \text{Ass}_{X_{i, \eta }}(\mathcal{F}_{i, \eta }). Thus it suffices to prove the result for the triples (X_ i, \mathcal{F}_ i, U_ i), in other words we may assume that X is affine.

Write X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B). Let N be a finite B-module such that \mathcal{F} = \widetilde{N}. Note that B_ K is Noetherian as it is a finite type K-algebra. Hence U_\eta is quasi-compact. Thus we can find finitely many g_1, \ldots , g_ m \in B such that D(g_ j) \subset U and such that U_\eta = D(g_1)_\eta \cup \ldots \cup D(g_ m)_\eta . Since \text{Ass}_{X_\eta }(\mathcal{F}_\eta ) \subset U_\eta we see that N_ K \to \bigoplus _ j (N_ K)_{g_ j} is injective. By Algebra, Lemma 10.24.4 this is equivalent to the injectivity of N_ K \to \bigoplus \nolimits _{j = 1, \ldots , m} N_ K, n \mapsto (g_1n, \ldots , g_ mn). Let I and M be the kernel and cokernel of this map over A, i.e., such that we have an exact sequence

0 \to I \to N \xrightarrow {(g_1, \ldots , g_ m)} \bigoplus \nolimits _{j = 1, \ldots , m} N \to M \to 0

After replacing A by A_ h for some nonzero h we may assume that B is a flat, finitely presented A-algebra and that both M and N are flat over A, see Algebra, Lemma 10.118.3. The flatness of N over A implies that N is torsion free as an A-module, see More on Algebra, Lemma 15.22.9. Hence N \subset N_ K. By construction I_ K = 0 which implies that I = 0 (as I \subset N \subset N_ K is a subset of I_ K). Hence now we have a short exact sequence

0 \to N \xrightarrow {(g_1, \ldots , g_ m)} \bigoplus \nolimits _{j = 1, \ldots , m} N \to M \to 0

with M flat over A. Hence for every homomorphism A \to \kappa where \kappa is a field, we obtain a short exact sequence

0 \to N \otimes _ A \kappa \xrightarrow {(g_1 \otimes 1, \ldots , g_ m \otimes 1)} \bigoplus \nolimits _{j = 1, \ldots , m} N \otimes _ A \kappa \to M \otimes _ A \kappa \to 0

see Algebra, Lemma 10.39.12. Reversing the arguments above this means that \bigcup D(g_ j \otimes 1) contains \text{Ass}_{B \otimes _ A \kappa }(N \otimes _ A \kappa ). As \bigcup D(g_ j \otimes 1) = \bigcup D(g_ j)_\kappa \subset U_\kappa we obtain that U_\kappa contains \text{Ass}_{X \otimes \kappa }(\mathcal{F} \otimes \kappa ) which is what we wanted to prove. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.