The Stacks project

28.19 Flat modules

On any ringed space $(X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$ we know what it means for an $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module to be flat (at a point), see Modules, Definition 17.17.1 (Definition 17.17.3). For quasi-coherent sheaves on an affine scheme this matches the notion defined in the algebra chapter.


Lemma 28.19.1. Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ be an affine scheme. Let $\mathcal{F} = \widetilde{M}$ for some $R$-module $M$. The quasi-coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ is a flat $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module if and only if $M$ is a flat $R$-module.

Proof. Flatness of $\mathcal{F}$ may be checked on the stalks, see Modules, Lemma 17.17.2. The same is true in the case of modules over a ring, see Algebra, Lemma 10.39.18. And since $\mathcal{F}_ x = M_{\mathfrak p}$ if $x$ corresponds to $\mathfrak p$ the lemma is true. $\square$

Comments (2)

Comment #2345 by Jonathan Gruner on

In Lemma 27.19.1, there seems to be a typo: “of if and only if”.

Also, in the text above the lemma, one could add that this is a statement about quasi-coherent sheaves: “For quasi-coherent sheaves on an affine scheme, this matches the notion defined in the algebra chapter.”

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 05NZ. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.