Lemma 97.4.1. Let \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y} \to \mathcal{Z} be 1-morphisms of categories fibred in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. If \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Z} and \mathcal{Y} \to \mathcal{Z} are representable by algebraic spaces and étale so is \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}.
97.4 Morphisms of stacks in groupoids
This section is preliminary and should be skipped on a first reading.
Proof. Let \mathcal{U} be a representable category fibred in groupoids over S. Let f : \mathcal{U} \to \mathcal{Y} be a 1-morphism. We have to show that \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} \mathcal{U} is representable by an algebraic space and étale over \mathcal{U}. Consider the composition h : \mathcal{U} \to \mathcal{Z}. Then
is a 1-morphism between categories fibres in groupoids which are both representable by algebraic spaces and both étale over \mathcal{U}. Hence by Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.16.6 this is represented by an étale morphism of algebraic spaces. Finally, we obtain the result we want as the morphism f induces a morphism \mathcal{U} \to \mathcal{Y} \times _\mathcal {Z} \mathcal{U} and we have
Lemma 97.4.2. Let \mathcal{X}, \mathcal{Y}, \mathcal{Z} be stacks in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. Suppose that \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y} and \mathcal{Z} \to \mathcal{Y} are 1-morphisms. If
\mathcal{Y}, \mathcal{Z} are representable by algebraic spaces Y, Z over S,
the associated morphism of algebraic spaces Y \to Z is surjective, flat and locally of finite presentation, and
\mathcal{Y} \times _\mathcal {Z} \mathcal{X} is a stack in setoids,
then \mathcal{X} is a stack in setoids.
Proof. This is a special case of Stacks, Lemma 8.6.10. \square
The following lemma is the analogue of Algebraic Stacks, Lemma 94.15.3 and will be superseded by the stronger Theorem 97.16.1.
Lemma 97.4.3. Let S be a scheme. Let u : \mathcal{U} \to \mathcal{X} be a 1-morphism of stacks in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. If
\mathcal{U} is representable by an algebraic space, and
u is representable by algebraic spaces, surjective, flat and locally of finite presentation,
then \Delta : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{X} \times \mathcal{X} representable by algebraic spaces.
Proof. Given two schemes T_1, T_2 over S denote \mathcal{T}_ i = (\mathit{Sch}/T_ i)_{fppf} the associated representable fibre categories. Suppose given 1-morphisms f_ i : \mathcal{T}_ i \to \mathcal{X}. According to Algebraic Stacks, Lemma 94.10.11 it suffices to prove that the 2-fibered product \mathcal{T}_1 \times _\mathcal {X} \mathcal{T}_2 is representable by an algebraic space. By Stacks, Lemma 8.6.8 this is in any case a stack in setoids. Thus \mathcal{T}_1 \times _\mathcal {X} \mathcal{T}_2 corresponds to some sheaf F on (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}, see Stacks, Lemma 8.6.3. Let U be the algebraic space which represents \mathcal{U}. By assumption
is representable by an algebraic space T'_ i over S. Hence \mathcal{T}_1' \times _\mathcal {U} \mathcal{T}_2' is representable by the algebraic space T'_1 \times _ U T'_2. Consider the commutative diagram
In this diagram the bottom square, the right square, the back square, and the front square are 2-fibre products. A formal argument then shows that \mathcal{T}_1' \times _\mathcal {U} \mathcal{T}_2' \to \mathcal{T}_1 \times _{\mathcal X} \mathcal{T}_2 is the “base change” of \mathcal{U} \to \mathcal{X}, more precisely the diagram
is a 2-fibre square. Hence T'_1 \times _ U T'_2 \to F is representable by algebraic spaces, flat, locally of finite presentation and surjective, see Algebraic Stacks, Lemmas 94.9.6, 94.9.7, 94.10.4, and 94.10.6. Therefore F is an algebraic space by Bootstrap, Theorem 80.10.1 and we win. \square
Lemma 97.4.4. Let \mathcal{X} be a category fibred in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. The following are equivalent
\Delta _\Delta : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{X} \times _{\mathcal{X} \times \mathcal{X}} \mathcal{X} is representable by algebraic spaces,
for every 1-morphism \mathcal{V} \to \mathcal{X} \times \mathcal{X} with \mathcal{V} representable (by a scheme) the fibre product \mathcal{Y} = \mathcal{X} \times _{\Delta , \mathcal{X} \times \mathcal{X}} \mathcal{V} has diagonal representable by algebraic spaces.
Proof. Although this is a bit of a brain twister, it is completely formal. Namely, recall that \mathcal{X} \times _{\mathcal{X} \times \mathcal{X}} \mathcal{X} = \mathcal{I}_\mathcal {X} is the inertia of \mathcal{X} and that \Delta _\Delta is the identity section of \mathcal{I}_\mathcal {X}, see Categories, Section 4.34. Thus condition (1) says the following: Given a scheme V, an object x of \mathcal{X} over V, and a morphism \alpha : x \to x of \mathcal{X}_ V the condition “\alpha = \text{id}_ x” defines an algebraic space over V. (In other words, there exists a monomorphism of algebraic spaces W \to V such that a morphism of schemes f : T \to V factors through W if and only if f^*\alpha = \text{id}_{f^*x}.)
On the other hand, let V be a scheme and let x, y be objects of \mathcal{X} over V. Then (x, y) define a morphism \mathcal{V} = (\mathit{Sch}/V)_{fppf} \to \mathcal{X} \times \mathcal{X}. Next, let h : V' \to V be a morphism of schemes and let \alpha : h^*x \to h^*y and \beta : h^*x \to h^*y be morphisms of \mathcal{X}_{V'}. Then (\alpha , \beta ) define a morphism \mathcal{V}' = (\mathit{Sch}/V)_{fppf} \to \mathcal{Y} \times \mathcal{Y}. Condition (2) now says that (with any choices as above) the condition “\alpha = \beta ” defines an algebraic space over V.
To see the equivalence, given (\alpha , \beta ) as in (2) we see that (1) implies that “\alpha ^{-1} \circ \beta = \text{id}_{h^*x}” defines an algebraic space. The implication (2) \Rightarrow (1) follows by taking h = \text{id}_ V and \beta = \text{id}_ x. \square
Comments (0)