Lemma 37.2.3. Any thickening of an affine scheme is affine.
Affineness is insensitive to thickenings
The case of a finite order thickening is [Proposition 5.1.9, EGA1].
Proof. This is a special case of Limits, Proposition 32.11.2. \square
Proof for a finite order thickening. Suppose that X \subset X' is a finite order thickening with X affine. Then we may use Serre's criterion to prove X' is affine. More precisely, we will use Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.3.1. Let \mathcal{F} be a quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_{X'}-module. It suffices to show that H^1(X', \mathcal{F}) = 0. Denote i : X \to X' the given closed immersion and denote \mathcal{I} = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(i^\sharp : \mathcal{O}_{X'} \to i_*\mathcal{O}_ X). By our discussion of finite order thickenings (following Definition 37.2.1) there exists an n \geq 0 and a filtration
by quasi-coherent submodules such that \mathcal{F}_ a/\mathcal{F}_{a + 1} is annihilated by \mathcal{I}. Namely, we can take \mathcal{F}_ a = \mathcal{I}^ a\mathcal{F}. Then \mathcal{F}_ a/\mathcal{F}_{a + 1} = i_*\mathcal{G}_ a for some quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-module \mathcal{G}_ a, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.4.1. We obtain
The second equality comes from Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.2.4 and the last equality from Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.2.2. Thus \mathcal{F} has a finite filtration whose successive quotients have vanishing first cohomology and it follows by a simple induction argument that H^1(X', \mathcal{F}) = 0. \square
Comments (5)
Comment #1089 by Nuno Cardoso on
Comment #1094 by Johan on
Comment #3819 by slogan_bot on
Comment #7931 by quasicompact on
Comment #8176 by Aise Johan de Jong on
There are also: