Lemma 74.9.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of algebraic spaces over $S$. Let $x \in |X|$. If $f$ is flat at $x$ and $X$ is geometrically unibranch at $x$, then $Y$ is geometrically unibranch at $f(x)$.

## 74.9 Descending properties of spaces

In this section we put some results of the following kind.

**Proof.**
Consider the map of étale local rings $\mathcal{O}_{Y, f(\overline{x})} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}$. By Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.30.8 this is flat. Hence if $\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}$ has a unique minimal prime, so does $\mathcal{O}_{Y, f(\overline{x})}$ (by going down, see Algebra, Lemma 10.39.19).
$\square$

Lemma 74.9.2. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of algebraic spaces over $S$. If $f$ is flat and surjective and $X$ is reduced, then $Y$ is reduced.

**Proof.**
Choose a scheme $V$ and a surjective étale morphism $V \to Y$. Choose a scheme $U$ and a surjective étale morphism $U \to X \times _ Y V$. As $f$ is surjective and flat, the morphism of schemes $U \to V$ is surjective and flat. In this way we reduce the problem to the case of schemes (as reducedness of $X$ and $Y$ is defined in terms of reducedness of $U$ and $V$, see Properties of Spaces, Section 66.7). The case of schemes is Descent, Lemma 35.19.1.
$\square$

Lemma 74.9.3. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of algebraic spaces. If $f$ is locally of finite presentation, flat, and surjective and $X$ is locally Noetherian, then $Y$ is locally Noetherian.

**Proof.**
Choose a scheme $V$ and a surjective étale morphism $V \to Y$. Choose a scheme $U$ and a surjective étale morphism $U \to X \times _ Y V$. As $f$ is surjective, flat, and locally of finite presentation the morphism of schemes $U \to V$ is surjective, flat, and locally of finite presentation. In this way we reduce the problem to the case of schemes (as being locally Noetherian for $X$ and $Y$ is defined in terms of being locally Noetherian of $U$ and $V$, see Properties of Spaces, Section 66.7). In the case of schemes the result follows from Descent, Lemma 35.16.1.
$\square$

Lemma 74.9.4. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of algebraic spaces. If $f$ is locally of finite presentation, flat, and surjective and $X$ is regular, then $Y$ is regular.

**Proof.**
By Lemma 74.9.3 we know that $Y$ is locally Noetherian. Choose a scheme $V$ and a surjective étale morphism $V \to Y$. It suffices to prove that the local rings of $V$ are all regular local rings, see Properties, Lemma 28.9.2. Choose a scheme $U$ and a surjective étale morphism $U \to X \times _ Y V$. As $f$ is surjective and flat the morphism of schemes $U \to V$ is surjective and flat. By assumption $U$ is a regular scheme in particular all of its local rings are regular (by the lemma above). Hence the lemma follows from Algebra, Lemma 10.110.9.
$\square$

Lemma 74.9.5. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a smooth morphism of algebraic spaces. If $Y$ is reduced, then $X$ is reduced. If $f$ is surjective and $X$ is reduced, then $Y$ is reduced.

**Proof.**
Choose a commutative diagram

where $U$ and $V$ are schemes, the vertical arrows are surjective and étale, and $U \to X \times _ Y V$ is surjective étale. Observe that $X$ is a reduced algebraic space if and only if $U$ is a reduced scheme by our definition of reduced algebraic spaces in Properties of Spaces, Section 66.7. Similarly for $Y$ and $V$. The morphism $U \to V$ is a smooth morphism of schemes, see Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.37.4. Since being reduced is local for the smooth topology for schemes (Descent, Lemma 35.18.1) we see that $U$ is reduced if $V$ is reduced. On the other hand, if $X \to Y$ is surjective, then $U \to V$ is surjective and in this case if $U$ is reduced, then $V$ is reduced. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)