Lemma 46.7.2. Let U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) be an affine scheme. The bounded below derived category D^+(\textit{Adeq}(\mathcal{O})) is the localization of K^+(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U)) at the multiplicative subset of universal quasi-isomorphisms.
Proof. If \varphi : \mathcal{F}^\bullet \to \mathcal{G}^\bullet is a morphism of complexes of quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ U-modules, then u\varphi : u\mathcal{F}^\bullet \to u\mathcal{G}^\bullet is a quasi-isomorphism if and only if \varphi is a universal quasi-isomorphism. Hence the collection S of universal quasi-isomorphisms is a saturated multiplicative system compatible with the triangulated structure by Derived Categories, Lemma 13.5.4. Hence S^{-1}K^+(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U)) exists and is a triangulated category, see Derived Categories, Proposition 13.5.6. We obtain a canonical functor can : S^{-1}K^+(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U)) \to D^{+}(\textit{Adeq}(\mathcal{O})) by Derived Categories, Lemma 13.5.7.
Note that, almost by definition, every adequate module on U has an embedding into a quasi-coherent sheaf, see Lemma 46.5.5. Hence by Derived Categories, Lemma 13.15.5 given \mathcal{F}^\bullet \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (K^+(\textit{Adeq}(\mathcal{O}))) there exists a quasi-isomorphism \mathcal{F}^\bullet \to u\mathcal{G}^\bullet where \mathcal{G}^\bullet \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (K^+(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U))). This proves that can is essentially surjective.
Similarly, suppose that \mathcal{F}^\bullet and \mathcal{G}^\bullet are bounded below complexes of quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ U-modules. A morphism in D^+(\textit{Adeq}(\mathcal{O})) between these consists of a pair f : u\mathcal{F}^\bullet \to \mathcal{H}^\bullet and s : u\mathcal{G}^\bullet \to \mathcal{H}^\bullet where s is a quasi-isomorphism. Pick a quasi-isomorphism s' : \mathcal{H}^\bullet \to u\mathcal{E}^\bullet . Then we see that s' \circ f : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{E}^\bullet and the universal quasi-isomorphism s' \circ s : \mathcal{G}^\bullet \to \mathcal{E}^\bullet give a morphism in S^{-1}K^{+}(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U)) mapping to the given morphism. This proves the "fully" part of full faithfulness. Faithfulness is proved similarly. \square
Comments (0)