Lemma 103.6.1. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an algebraic stack. Let $f_ j : \mathcal{X}_ j \to \mathcal{X}$ be a family of smooth morphisms of algebraic stacks with $|\mathcal{X}| =\bigcup |f_ j|(|\mathcal{X}_ j|)$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}$-modules on $\mathcal{X}_{\acute{e}tale}$. If each $f_ j^{-1}\mathcal{F}$ is locally quasi-coherent, then so is $\mathcal{F}$.

## 103.6 Locally quasi-coherent modules

Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an algebraic stack. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a presheaf of $\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}$-modules. We can ask whether $\mathcal{F}$ is *locally quasi-coherent*, see Sheaves on Stacks, Definition 96.12.1. Briefly, this means $\mathcal{F}$ is an $\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}$-module for the étale topology such that for any morphism $f : U \to \mathcal{X}$ the restriction $f^*\mathcal{F}|_{U_{\acute{e}tale}}$ is quasi-coherent on $U_{\acute{e}tale}$. (The actual definition is slightly different, but equivalent.) A useful fact is that

is a weak Serre subcategory, see Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 96.12.4.

**Proof.**
We may replace each of the algebraic stacks $\mathcal{X}_ j$ by a scheme $U_ j$ (using that any algebraic stack has a smooth covering by a scheme and that compositions of smooth morphisms are smooth, see Morphisms of Stacks, Lemma 101.33.2). The pullback of $\mathcal{F}$ to $(\mathit{Sch}/U_ j)_{\acute{e}tale}$ is still locally quasi-coherent, see Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 96.12.3. Then $f = \coprod f_ j : U = \coprod U_ j \to \mathcal{X}$ is a surjective smooth morphism. Let $x$ be an object of $\mathcal{X}$. By Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 96.19.10 there exists an étale covering $\{ x_ i \to x\} _{i \in I}$ such that each $x_ i$ lifts to an object $u_ i$ of $(\mathit{Sch}/U)_{\acute{e}tale}$. This just means that $x$, $x_ i$ live over schemes $V$, $V_ i$, that $\{ V_ i \to V\} $ is an étale covering, and that $x_ i$ comes from a morphism $u_ i : V_ i \to U$. The restriction $x_ i^*\mathcal{F}|_{V_{i, {\acute{e}tale}}}$ is equal to the restriction of $f^*\mathcal{F}$ to $V_{i, {\acute{e}tale}}$, see Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 96.9.3. Hence $x^*\mathcal{F}|_{V_{\acute{e}tale}}$ is a sheaf on the small étale site of $V$ which is quasi-coherent when restricted to $V_{i, {\acute{e}tale}}$ for each $i$. This implies that it is quasi-coherent (as desired), for example by Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.29.6.
$\square$

Lemma 103.6.2. Let $f : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphism of algebraic stacks. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a locally quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}$-module on $\mathcal{X}_{\acute{e}tale}$. Then $R^ if_*\mathcal{F}$ (computed in the étale topology) is locally quasi-coherent on $\mathcal{Y}_{\acute{e}tale}$.

**Proof.**
We will use Lemma 103.5.1 to prove this. We will check its assumptions (1) – (4). Parts (1) and (2) follows from Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 96.12.4. Part (3) follows from Lemma 103.6.1. Thus it suffices to show (4).

Suppose $f : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}$ is a morphism of algebraic stacks such that $\mathcal{X}$ and $\mathcal{Y}$ are representable by affine schemes $X$ and $Y$. Choose any object $y$ of $\mathcal{Y}$ lying over a scheme $V$. For clarity, denote $\mathcal{V} = (\mathit{Sch}/V)_{fppf}$ the algebraic stack corresponding to $V$. Consider the cartesian diagram

Thus $\mathcal{Z}$ is representable by the scheme $Z = V \times _ Y X$ and $f'$ is quasi-compact and separated (even affine). By Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 96.22.3 we have

The right hand side is a quasi-coherent sheaf on $V_{\acute{e}tale}$ by Cohomology of Spaces, Lemma 69.3.1. This implies the left hand side is quasi-coherent which is what we had to prove. $\square$

Lemma 103.6.3. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an algebraic stack. Let $f_ j : \mathcal{X}_ j \to \mathcal{X}$ be a family of flat and locally finitely presented morphisms of algebraic stacks with $|\mathcal{X}| =\bigcup |f_ j|(|\mathcal{X}_ j|)$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}$-modules on $\mathcal{X}_{fppf}$. If each $f_ j^{-1}\mathcal{F}$ is locally quasi-coherent, then so is $\mathcal{F}$.

**Proof.**
First, suppose there is a morphism $a : \mathcal{U} \to \mathcal{X}$ which is surjective, flat, locally of finite presentation, quasi-compact, and quasi-separated such that $a^*\mathcal{F}$ is locally quasi-coherent. Then there is an exact sequence

where $b$ is the morphism $b : \mathcal{U} \times _\mathcal {X} \mathcal{U} \to \mathcal{X}$, see Sheaves on Stacks, Proposition 96.19.7 and Lemma 96.19.10. Moreover, the pullback $b^*\mathcal{F}$ is the pullback of $a^*\mathcal{F}$ via one of the projection morphisms, hence is locally quasi-coherent (Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 96.12.3). The modules $a_*a^*\mathcal{F}$ and $b_*b^*\mathcal{F}$ are locally quasi-coherent by Lemma 103.6.2. (Note that $a_*$ and $b_*$ don't care about which topology is used to calculate them.) We conclude that $\mathcal{F}$ is locally quasi-coherent, see Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 96.12.4.

We are going to reduce the proof of the general case the situation in the first paragraph. Let $x$ be an object of $\mathcal{X}$ lying over the scheme $U$. We have to show that $\mathcal{F}|_{U_{\acute{e}tale}}$ is a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ U$-module. It suffices to do this (Zariski) locally on $U$, hence we may assume that $U$ is affine. By Morphisms of Stacks, Lemma 101.27.14 there exists an fppf covering $\{ a_ i : U_ i \to U\} $ such that each $x \circ a_ i$ factors through some $f_ j$. Hence $a_ i^*\mathcal{F}$ is locally quasi-coherent on $(\mathit{Sch}/U_ i)_{fppf}$. After refining the covering we may assume $\{ U_ i \to U\} _{i = 1, \ldots , n}$ is a standard fppf covering. Then $x^*\mathcal{F}$ is an fppf module on $(\mathit{Sch}/U)_{fppf}$ whose pullback by the morphism $a : U_1 \amalg \ldots \amalg U_ n \to U$ is locally quasi-coherent. Hence by the first paragraph we see that $x^*\mathcal{F}$ is locally quasi-coherent, which certainly implies that $\mathcal{F}|_{U_{\acute{e}tale}}$ is quasi-coherent. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)