Lemma 103.10.1. Let \mathcal{X} be an algebraic stack. Let \textit{LQCoh}^{fbc}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}) be the category of locally quasi-coherent modules with the flat base change property, see Section 103.8. The inclusion functor i : \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}) \to \textit{LQCoh}^{fbc}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}) has a right adjoint
Q : \textit{LQCoh}^{fbc}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}) \to \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})
such that Q \circ i is the identity functor.
Proof.
Choose a scheme U and a surjective smooth morphism f : U \to \mathcal{X}. Set R = U \times _\mathcal {X} U so that we obtain a smooth groupoid (U, R, s, t, c) in algebraic spaces with the property that \mathcal{X} = [U/R], see Algebraic Stacks, Lemma 94.16.2. We may and do replace \mathcal{X} by [U/R]. By Sheaves on Stacks, Proposition 96.14.3 there is an equivalence
q_1 : \mathit{QCoh}(U, R, s, t, c) \longrightarrow \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})
Let us construct a functor
q_2 : \textit{LQCoh}^{fbc}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}) \longrightarrow \mathit{QCoh}(U, R, s, t, c)
by the following rule: if \mathcal{F} is an object of \textit{LQCoh}^{fbc}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}) then we set
q_2(\mathcal{F}) = (f^*\mathcal{F}|_{U_{\acute{e}tale}}, \alpha )
where \alpha is the isomorphism
t_{small}^*(f^*\mathcal{F}|_{U_{\acute{e}tale}}) \to t^*f^*\mathcal{F}|_{R_{\acute{e}tale}} \to s^*f^*\mathcal{F}|_{R_{\acute{e}tale}} \to s_{small}^*(f^*\mathcal{F}|_{U_{\acute{e}tale}})
where the outer two morphisms are the comparison maps. Note that q_2(\mathcal{F}) is quasi-coherent precisely because \mathcal{F} is locally quasi-coherent and that we used (and needed) the flat base change property in the construction of the descent datum \alpha . We omit the verification that the cocycle condition (see Groupoids in Spaces, Definition 78.12.1) holds. Looking at the proof of Sheaves on Stacks, Proposition 96.14.3 we see that q_2 \circ i is the quasi-inverse to q_1. We define Q = q_1 \circ q_2. Let \mathcal{F} be an object of \textit{LQCoh}^{fbc}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}) and let \mathcal{G} be an object of \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}). We have
\begin{align*} \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\textit{LQCoh}^{fbc}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})} (i(\mathcal{G}), \mathcal{F}) & = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathit{QCoh}(U, R, s, t, c)}(q_2(i(\mathcal{G})), q_2(\mathcal{F})) \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})}(\mathcal{G}, Q(\mathcal{F})) \end{align*}
where the first equality is Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 96.14.4 and the second equality holds because q_1 \circ i and q_2 are quasi-inverse equivalences of categories. The assertion Q \circ i \cong \text{id} is a formal consequence of the fact that i is fully faithful.
\square
Comments (0)