Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 103.14.5. Let \mathcal{X} be an algebraic stack. Notation as in Lemmas 103.14.2 and 103.14.4.

  1. We have g_!\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}_{lisse,{\acute{e}tale}}} = \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}.

  2. We have g_!\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}_{flat, fppf}} = \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X}.

Proof. In this proof we write \mathcal{C} = \mathcal{X}_{\acute{e}tale} (resp. \mathcal{C} = \mathcal{X}_{fppf}) and we denote \mathcal{C}' = \mathcal{X}_{lisse,{\acute{e}tale}} (resp. \mathcal{C}' = \mathcal{X}_{flat, fppf}). Then \mathcal{C}' is a full subcategory of \mathcal{C}. In this proof we will think of objects V of \mathcal{C} as schemes over \mathcal{X} and objects U of \mathcal{C}' as schemes smooth (resp. flat) over \mathcal{X}. Finally, we write \mathcal{O} = \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X} and \mathcal{O}' = \mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}_{lisse,{\acute{e}tale}}} (resp. \mathcal{O}' = \mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}_{flat,fppf}}). In the notation above we have \mathcal{O}(V) = \Gamma (V, \mathcal{O}_ V) and \mathcal{O}'(U) = \Gamma (U, \mathcal{O}_ U). Consider the \mathcal{O}-module homomorphism g_!\mathcal{O}' \to \mathcal{O} adjoint to the identification \mathcal{O}' = g^{-1}\mathcal{O}.

Recall that g_!\mathcal{O}' is the sheaf associated to the presheaf g_{p!}\mathcal{O}' given by the rule

V \longmapsto \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{V \to U} \mathcal{O}'(U)

where the colimit is taken in the category of abelian groups (Modules on Sites, Definition 18.16.1). Below we will use frequently that if

V \to U \to U'

are morphisms and if f' \in \mathcal{O}'(U') restricts to f \in \mathcal{O}'(U), then (V \to U, f) and (V \to U', f') define the same element of the colimit. Also, g_!\mathcal{O}' \to \mathcal{O} maps the element (V \to U, f) simply to the pullback of f to V.

Let us prove that g_!\mathcal{O}' \to \mathcal{O} is surjective. Let h \in \mathcal{O}(V) for some object V of \mathcal{C}. It suffices to show that h is locally in the image. Choose an object U of \mathcal{C}' corresponding to a surjective smooth morphism U \to \mathcal{X}. Since U \times _\mathcal {X} V \to V is surjective smooth, after replacing V by the members of an étale covering of V we may assume there exists a morphism V \to U, see Topologies on Spaces, Lemma 73.4.4. Using h we obtain a morphism V \to U \times \mathbf{A}^1 such that writing \mathbf{A}^1 = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z}[t]) the element t \in \mathcal{O}(U \times \mathbf{A}^1) pulls back to h. Since U \times \mathbf{A}^1 is an object of \mathcal{C}' we see that (V \to U \times \mathbf{A}^1, t) is an element of the colimit above which maps to h \in \mathcal{O}(V) as desired.

Suppose that s \in g_!\mathcal{O}'(V) is a section mapping to zero in \mathcal{O}(V). To finish the proof we have to show that s is zero. After replacing V by the members of a covering we may assume s is an element of the colimit

\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{V \to U} \mathcal{O}'(U)

Say s = \sum (\varphi _ i, s_ i) is a finite sum with \varphi _ i : V \to U_ i, U_ i smooth (resp. flat) over \mathcal{X}, and s_ i \in \Gamma (U_ i, \mathcal{O}_{U_ i}). Choose a scheme W surjective étale over the algebraic space U = U_1 \times _\mathcal {X} \ldots \times _\mathcal {X} U_ n. Note that W is still smooth (resp. flat) over \mathcal{X}, i.e., defines an object of \mathcal{C}'. The fibre product

V' = V \times _{(\varphi _1, \ldots , \varphi _ n), U} W

is surjective étale over V, hence it suffices to show that s maps to zero in g_!\mathcal{O}'(V'). Note that the restriction \sum (\varphi _ i, s_ i)|_{V'} corresponds to the sum of the pullbacks of the functions s_ i to W. In other words, we have reduced to the case of (\varphi , s) where \varphi : V \to U is a morphism with U in \mathcal{C}' and s \in \mathcal{O}'(U) restricts to zero in \mathcal{O}(V). By the commutative diagram

\xymatrix{ V \ar[rr]_-{(\varphi , 0)} \ar[rrd]_\varphi & & U \times \mathbf{A}^1 \\ & & U \ar[u]_{(\text{id}, 0)} }

we see that ((\varphi , 0) : V \to U \times \mathbf{A}^1, \text{pr}_2^*x) represents zero in the colimit above. Hence we may replace U by U \times \mathbf{A}^1, \varphi by (\varphi , 0) and s by \text{pr}_1^*s + \text{pr}_2^*x. Thus we may assume that the vanishing locus Z : s = 0 in U of s is smooth (resp. flat) over \mathcal{X}. Then we see that (V \to Z, 0) and (\varphi , s) have the same value in the colimit, i.e., we see that the element s is zero as desired. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.