Proof.
We will use without further mention that formation of the naive cotangent complex commutes with localization, see Section 10.134, especially Lemma 10.134.13. Note that \Omega _{S/R} is a finitely presented S-module, see Lemma 10.131.15. Hence (2), (3), and (4) are equivalent by Lemma 10.78.2. It is clear that (1) implies the equivalent conditions (2), (3), and (4). Assume (2) holds. Writing S_\mathfrak q as the colimit of principal localizations we see from Lemma 10.127.6 that we can find a g \in S, g \not\in \mathfrak q such that (\Omega _{S/R})_ g is finite free. Choose a presentation \alpha : R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \to S with kernel I. We may work with \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits (\alpha ) instead of \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{S/R}, see Lemma 10.134.2. The surjection
\Omega _{R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/R} \otimes _ R S \to \Omega _{S/R} \to 0
has a right inverse after inverting g because (\Omega _{S/R})_ g is projective. Hence the image of \text{d} : (I/I^2)_ g \to \Omega _{R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/R} \otimes _ R S_ g is a direct summand and this map has a right inverse too. We conclude that H_1(L_{S/R})_ g is a quotient of (I/I^2)_ g. In particular H_1(L_{S/R})_ g is a finite S_ g-module. Thus the vanishing of H_1(L_{S/R})_{\mathfrak q} implies the vanishing of H_1(L_{S/R})_{gg'} for some g' \in S, g' \not\in \mathfrak q. Then R \to S_{gg'} is smooth by definition.
\square
Comments (3)
Comment #8495 by Et on
Comment #8612 by amnon yekutieli on
Comment #9105 by Stacks project on