15.32 Regular ideals
We will discuss the notion of a regular ideal sheaf in great generality in Divisors, Section 31.20. Here we define the corresponding notion in the affine case, i.e., in the case of an ideal in a ring.
Definition 15.32.1. Let R be a ring and let I \subset R be an ideal.
We say I is a regular ideal if for every \mathfrak p \in V(I) there exists a g \in R, g \not\in \mathfrak p and a regular sequence f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in R_ g such that I_ g is generated by f_1, \ldots , f_ r.
We say I is a Koszul-regular ideal if for every \mathfrak p \in V(I) there exists a g \in R, g \not\in \mathfrak p and a Koszul-regular sequence f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in R_ g such that I_ g is generated by f_1, \ldots , f_ r.
We say I is a H_1-regular ideal if for every \mathfrak p \in V(I) there exists a g \in R, g \not\in \mathfrak p and an H_1-regular sequence f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in R_ g such that I_ g is generated by f_1, \ldots , f_ r.
We say I is a quasi-regular ideal if for every \mathfrak p \in V(I) there exists a g \in R, g \not\in \mathfrak p and a quasi-regular sequence f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in R_ g such that I_ g is generated by f_1, \ldots , f_ r.
It is clear that given I \subset R we have the implications
\begin{align*} I\text{ is a regular ideal} & \Rightarrow I\text{ is a Koszul-regular ideal} \\ & \Rightarrow I\text{ is a }H_1\text{-regular ideal} \\ & \Rightarrow I\text{ is a quasi-regular ideal} \end{align*}
see Lemmas 15.30.2, 15.30.3, and 15.30.6. Such an ideal is always finitely generated.
Lemma 15.32.2. A quasi-regular ideal is finitely generated.
Proof.
Let I \subset R be a quasi-regular ideal. Since V(I) is quasi-compact, there exist g_1, \ldots , g_ m \in R such that V(I) \subset D(g_1) \cup \ldots \cup D(g_ m) and such that I_{g_ j} is generated by a quasi-regular sequence g_{j1}, \ldots , g_{jr_ j} \in R_{g_ j}. Write g_{ji} = g'_{ji}/g_ j^{e_{ij}} for some g'_{ij} \in I. Write 1 + x = \sum g_ j h_ j for some x \in I which is possible as V(I) \subset D(g_1) \cup \ldots \cup D(g_ m). Note that \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) = D(g_1) \cup \ldots \cup D(g_ m) \bigcup D(x) Then I is generated by the elements g'_{ij} and x as these generate on each of the pieces of the cover, see Algebra, Lemma 10.23.2.
\square
Lemma 15.32.3. Let I \subset R be a quasi-regular ideal of a ring. Then I/I^2 is a finite projective R/I-module.
Proof.
This follows from Algebra, Lemma 10.78.2 and the definitions.
\square
We prove flat descent for Koszul-regular, H_1-regular, quasi-regular ideals.
Lemma 15.32.4. Let A \to B be a faithfully flat ring map. Let I \subset A be an ideal. If IB is a Koszul-regular (resp. H_1-regular, resp. quasi-regular) ideal in B, then I is a Koszul-regular (resp. H_1-regular, resp. quasi-regular) ideal in A.
Proof.
We fix the prime \mathfrak p \supset I throughout the proof. Assume IB is quasi-regular. By Lemma 15.32.2 IB is a finite module, hence I is a finite A-module by Algebra, Lemma 10.83.2. As A \to B is flat we see that
I/I^2 \otimes _{A/I} B/IB = I/I^2 \otimes _ A B = IB/(IB)^2.
As IB is quasi-regular, the B/IB-module IB/(IB)^2 is finite locally free. Hence I/I^2 is finite projective, see Algebra, Proposition 10.83.3. In particular, after replacing A by A_ f for some f \in A, f \not\in \mathfrak p we may assume that I/I^2 is free of rank r. Pick f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in I which give a basis of I/I^2. By Nakayama's lemma (see Algebra, Lemma 10.20.1) we see that, after another replacement A \leadsto A_ f as above, I is generated by f_1, \ldots , f_ r.
Proof of the “quasi-regular” case. Above we have seen that I/I^2 is free on the r-generators f_1, \ldots , f_ r. To finish the proof in this case we have to show that the maps \text{Sym}^ d(I/I^2) \to I^ d/I^{d + 1} are isomorphisms for each d \geq 2. This is clear as the faithfully flat base changes \text{Sym}^ d(IB/(IB)^2) \to (IB)^ d/(IB)^{d + 1} are isomorphisms locally on B by assumption. Details omitted.
Proof of the “H_1-regular” and “Koszul-regular” case. Consider the sequence of elements f_1, \ldots , f_ r generating I we constructed above. By Lemma 15.30.15 we see that f_1, \ldots , f_ r map to a H_1-regular or Koszul-regular sequence in B_ g for any g \in B such that IB is generated by an H_1-regular or Koszul-regular sequence. Hence K_\bullet (A, f_1, \ldots , f_ r) \otimes _ A B_ g has vanishing H_1 or H_ i, i > 0. Since the homology of K_\bullet (B, f_1, \ldots , f_ r) = K_\bullet (A, f_1, \ldots , f_ r) \otimes _ A B is annihilated by IB (see Lemma 15.28.6) and since V(IB) \subset \bigcup _{g\text{ as above}} D(g) we conclude that K_\bullet (A, f_1, \ldots , f_ r) \otimes _ A B has vanishing homology in degree 1 or all positive degrees. Using that A \to B is faithfully flat we conclude that the same is true for K_\bullet (A, f_1, \ldots , f_ r).
\square
Lemma 15.32.5. Let A be a ring. Let I \subset J \subset A be ideals. Assume that J/I \subset A/I is a H_1-regular ideal. Then I \cap J^2 = IJ.
Proof.
Follows immediately from Lemma 15.30.9 by localizing.
\square
Comments (0)