Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 16.10.3. Let k \to A \to \Lambda \supset \mathfrak q be as in Situation 16.9.1 where

  1. k is a field,

  2. \Lambda is Noetherian,

  3. \mathfrak q is minimal over \mathfrak h_ A,

  4. \Lambda _\mathfrak q is a regular local ring, and

  5. the field extension \kappa (\mathfrak q)/k is separable.

Then k \to A \to \Lambda \supset \mathfrak q can be resolved.

Proof. Set d = \dim \Lambda _\mathfrak q. Set R = k[x_1, \ldots , x_ d]. Choose n > 0 such that \mathfrak q^ n\Lambda _\mathfrak q \subset \mathfrak h_ A\Lambda _\mathfrak q which is possible as \mathfrak q is minimal over \mathfrak h_ A. Choose generators a_1, \ldots , a_ r of H_{A/R}. Set

B = A[x_1, \ldots , x_ d, z_{ij}]/(x_ i^ n - \sum z_{ij}a_ j)

Each B_{a_ j} is smooth over R it is a polynomial algebra over A_{a_ j}[x_1, \ldots , x_ d] and A_{a_ j} is smooth over k. Hence B_{x_ i} is smooth over R. Let B \to C be the R-algebra map constructed in Lemma 16.3.1 which comes with a R-algebra retraction C \to B. In particular a map C \to \Lambda fitting into the diagram above. By construction C_{x_ i} is a smooth R-algebra with \Omega _{C_{x_ i}/R} free. Hence we can find c > 0 such that x_ i^ c is strictly standard in C/R, see Lemma 16.3.7. Now choose \pi _1, \ldots , \pi _ d \in \Lambda as in Lemma 16.10.2 where n = n, e = 8c, \mathfrak q = \mathfrak q and I = \mathfrak h_ A. Write \pi _ i^ n = \sum \lambda _{ij} a_ j for some \pi _{ij} \in \Lambda . There is a map B \to \Lambda given by x_ i \mapsto \pi _ i and z_{ij} \mapsto \lambda _{ij}. Set R = k[x_1, \ldots , x_ d]. Diagram

\xymatrix{ R \ar[r] & B \ar[rd] \\ k \ar[u] \ar[r] & A \ar[u] \ar[r] & \Lambda }

Now we apply Lemma 16.9.2 to R \to C \to \Lambda \supset \mathfrak q and the sequence of elements x_1^ c, \ldots , x_ d^ c of R. Assumption (2) is clear. Assumption (1) holds for R by inspection and for \Lambda by our choice of \pi _1, \ldots , \pi _ d. (Note that if \text{Ann}_\Lambda (\pi ) = \text{Ann}_\Lambda (\pi ^2), then we have \text{Ann}_\Lambda (\pi ) = \text{Ann}_\Lambda (\pi ^ c) for all c > 0.) Thus it suffices to resolve

R/(x_1^ e, \ldots , x_ d^ e) \to C/(x_1^ e, \ldots , x_ d^ e) \to \Lambda /(\pi _1^ e, \ldots , \pi _ d^ e) \supset \mathfrak q/(\pi _1^ e, \ldots , \pi _ d^ e)

for e = 8c. By Lemma 16.9.4 it suffices to resolve this after localizing at \mathfrak q. But since x_1, \ldots , x_ d map to a regular sequence in \Lambda _\mathfrak q we see that R_\mathfrak p \to \Lambda _\mathfrak q is flat, see Algebra, Lemma 10.128.2. Hence

R_\mathfrak p/(x_1^ e, \ldots , x_ d^ e) \to \Lambda _\mathfrak q/(\pi _1^ e, \ldots , \pi _ d^ e)

is a flat ring map of Artinian local rings. Moreover, this map induces a separable field extension on residue fields by assumption. Thus this map is a filtered colimit of smooth algebras by Algebra, Lemma 10.158.11 and Proposition 16.5.3. Existence of the desired solution follows from Algebra, Lemma 10.127.4. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #2760 by Anonymous on

Towards the end of the proof it should say is flat by Algebra, Lemma 10.127.2. And the following map should map from .


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.