Remark 60.24.3 (Čech complex). Let p be a prime number. Let (A, I, \gamma ) be a divided power ring with A a \mathbf{Z}_{(p)}-algebra. Set S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) and S_0 = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A/I). Let X be a separated1 scheme over S_0 such that p is locally nilpotent on X. Let \mathcal{F} be a crystal in quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_{X/S}-modules.
Choose an affine open covering X = \bigcup _{\lambda \in \Lambda } U_\lambda of X. Write U_\lambda = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(C_\lambda ). Choose a polynomial algebra P_\lambda over A and a surjection P_\lambda \to C_\lambda . Having fixed these choices we can construct a Čech complex which computes R\Gamma (\text{Cris}(X/S), \mathcal{F}).
Given n \geq 0 and \lambda _0, \ldots , \lambda _ n \in \Lambda write U_{\lambda _0 \ldots \lambda _ n} = U_{\lambda _0} \cap \ldots \cap U_{\lambda _ n}. This is an affine scheme by assumption. Write U_{\lambda _0 \ldots \lambda _ n} = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(C_{\lambda _0 \ldots \lambda _ n}). Set
which comes with a canonical surjection onto C_{\lambda _0 \ldots \lambda _ n}. Denote the kernel J_{\lambda _0 \ldots \lambda _ n} and set D_{\lambda _0 \ldots \lambda _ n} the p-adically completed divided power envelope of J_{\lambda _0 \ldots \lambda _ n} in P_{\lambda _0 \ldots \lambda _ n} relative to \gamma . Let M_{\lambda _0 \ldots \lambda _ n} be the P_{\lambda _0 \ldots \lambda _ n}-module corresponding to the restriction of \mathcal{F} to \text{Cris}(U_{\lambda _0 \ldots \lambda _ n}/S) via Proposition 60.17.4. By construction we obtain a cosimplicial divided power ring D(*) having in degree n the ring
(use that divided power envelopes are functorial and the trivial cosimplicial structure on the ring P(*) defined similarly). Since M_{\lambda _0 \ldots \lambda _ n} is the “value” of \mathcal{F} on the objects \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(D_{\lambda _0 \ldots \lambda _ n}) we see that M(*) defined by the rule
forms a cosimplicial D(*)-module. Now we claim that we have
Here s(-) denotes the cochain complex associated to a cosimplicial module (see Simplicial, Section 14.25).
Hints: The proof of this is similar to the proof of Proposition 60.21.1 (in particular the result holds for any module satisfying the assumptions of that proposition).
Comments (0)
There are also: