The Stacks project

37.19 Regular morphisms

Compare with Section 37.18. The algebraic version of this notion is discussed in More on Algebra, Section 15.41.

Definition 37.19.1. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Assume that all the fibres $X_ y$ are locally Noetherian schemes.

  1. Let $x \in X$, and $y = f(x)$. We say that $f$ is regular at $x$ if $f$ is flat at $x$, and the scheme $X_ y$ is geometrically regular at $x$ over $\kappa (y)$ (see Varieties, Definition 33.12.1).

  2. We say $f$ is a regular morphism if $f$ is regular at every point of $X$.

The condition that the morphism $X \to Y$ is regular is stronger than just requiring all the fibres to be regular locally Noetherian schemes.

Lemma 37.19.2. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Assume all fibres of $f$ are locally Noetherian. The following are equivalent

  1. $f$ is regular,

  2. $f$ is flat and its fibres are geometrically regular schemes,

  3. for every pair of affine opens $U \subset X$, $V \subset Y$ with $f(U) \subset V$ the ring map $\mathcal{O}(V) \to \mathcal{O}(U)$ is regular,

  4. there exists an open covering $Y = \bigcup _{j \in J} V_ j$ and open coverings $f^{-1}(V_ j) = \bigcup _{i \in I_ j} U_ i$ such that each of the morphisms $U_ i \to V_ j$ is regular, and

  5. there exists an affine open covering $Y = \bigcup _{j \in J} V_ j$ and affine open coverings $f^{-1}(V_ j) = \bigcup _{i \in I_ j} U_ i$ such that the ring maps $\mathcal{O}(V_ j) \to \mathcal{O}(U_ i)$ are regular.

Proof. The equivalence of (1) and (2) is immediate from the definitions. Let $x \in X$ with $y = f(x)$. By definition $f$ is flat at $x$ if and only if $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is a flat ring map, and $X_ y$ is geometrically regular at $x$ over $\kappa (y)$ if and only if $\mathcal{O}_{X_ y, x} = \mathcal{O}_{X, x}/\mathfrak m_ y\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is a geometrically regular algebra over $\kappa (y)$. Hence Whether or not $f$ is regular at $x$ depends only on the local homomorphism of local rings $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$. Thus the equivalence of (1) and (4) is clear.

Recall (More on Algebra, Definition 15.41.1) that a ring map $A \to B$ is regular if and only if it is flat and the fibre rings $B \otimes _ A \kappa (\mathfrak p)$ are Noetherian and geometrically regular for all primes $\mathfrak p \subset A$. By Varieties, Lemma 33.12.3 this is equivalent to $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B \otimes _ A \kappa (\mathfrak p))$ being a geometrically regular scheme over $\kappa (\mathfrak p)$. Thus we see that (2) implies (3). It is clear that (3) implies (5). Finally, assume (5). This implies that $f$ is flat (see Morphisms, Lemma 29.25.3). Moreover, if $y \in Y$, then $y \in V_ j$ for some $j$ and we see that $X_ y = \bigcup _{i \in I_ j} U_{i, y}$ with each $U_{i, y}$ geometrically regular over $\kappa (y)$ by Varieties, Lemma 33.12.3. Another application of Varieties, Lemma 33.12.3 shows that $X_ y$ is geometrically regular. Hence (2) holds and the proof of the lemma is finished. $\square$

Proof. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a smooth morphism. As $f$ is locally of finite presentation, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.34.8 the fibres $X_ y$ are locally of finite type over a field, hence locally Noetherian. Moreover, $f$ is flat, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.34.9. Finally, the fibres $X_ y$ are smooth over a field (by Morphisms, Lemma 29.34.5) and hence geometrically regular by Varieties, Lemma 33.25.4. Thus $f$ is regular by Lemma 37.19.2. $\square$

Lemma 37.19.4. The property $\mathcal{P}(f)=$“the fibres of $f$ are locally Noetherian and $f$ is regular” is local in the fppf topology on the target and local in the smooth topology on the source.

Proof. We have $\mathcal{P}(f) = \mathcal{P}_1(f) \wedge \mathcal{P}_2(f) \wedge \mathcal{P}_3(f)$ where $\mathcal{P}_1(f)=$“the fibres of $f$ are locally Noetherian”, $\mathcal{P}_2(f)=$“$f$ is flat”, and $\mathcal{P}_3(f)=$“the fibres of $f$ are geometrically regular”. We have already seen that $\mathcal{P}_1$ and $\mathcal{P}_2$ are local in the fppf topology on the source and the target, see Lemma 37.18.4, and Descent, Lemmas 35.20.15 and 35.24.1. Thus we have to deal with $\mathcal{P}_3$.

Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Let $\{ \varphi _ i : Y_ i \to Y\} _{i \in I}$ be an fpqc covering of $Y$. Denote $f_ i : X_ i \to Y_ i$ the base change of $f$ by $\varphi _ i$. Let $i \in I$ and let $y_ i \in Y_ i$ be a point. Set $y = \varphi _ i(y_ i)$. Note that

\[ X_{i, y_ i} = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (y_ i)) \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa (y))} X_ y. \]

Hence in this situation we have that $X_ y$ is geometrically regular if and only if $X_{i, y_ i}$ is geometrically regular, see Varieties, Lemma 33.12.4. This fact implies $\mathcal{P}_3$ is fpqc local on the target.

Let $\{ X_ i \to X\} $ be a smooth covering of $X$. Let $y \in Y$. In this case $\{ X_{i, y} \to X_ y\} $ is a smooth covering of the fibre. Hence the locality of $\mathcal{P}_3$ for the smooth topology on the source follows from Descent, Lemma 35.15.4. Combining the above the lemma follows. $\square$

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 07R6. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.