Lemma 37.14.3. Let X \to X' be a thickening of schemes and let X \to Y be an affine morphism of schemes. Then there exists a pushout
\xymatrix{ X \ar[r] \ar[d]_ f & X' \ar[d]^{f'} \\ Y \ar[r] & Y' }
in the category of schemes. Moreover, Y \subset Y' is a thickening, X = Y \times _{Y'} X', and
\mathcal{O}_{Y'} = \mathcal{O}_ Y \times _{f_*\mathcal{O}_ X} f'_*\mathcal{O}_{X'}
as sheaves on |Y| = |Y'|.
Proof.
We first construct Y' as a ringed space. Namely, as topological space we take Y' = Y. Denote f' : X' \to Y' the map of topological spaces which equals f. As structure sheaf \mathcal{O}_{Y'} we take the right hand side of the equation of the lemma. To see that Y' is a scheme, we have to show that any point has an affine neighbourhood. Since the formation of the fibre product of sheaves commutes with restricting to opens, we may assume Y is affine. Then X is affine (as f is affine) and X' is affine as well (see Lemma 37.2.3). Say Y \leftarrow X \rightarrow X' corresponds to B \rightarrow A \leftarrow A'. Set B' = B \times _ A A'; this is the global sections of \mathcal{O}_{Y'}. As A' \to A is surjective with locally nilpotent kernel we see that B' \to B is surjective with locally nilpotent kernel. Hence \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B') = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B) (as topological spaces). We claim that Y' = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B'). To see this we will show for g' \in B' with image g \in B that \mathcal{O}_{Y'}(D(g)) = B'_{g'}. Namely, by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.5.3 we see that
(B')_{g'} = B_ g \times _{A_ h} A'_{h'}
where h \in A, h' \in A' are the images of g'. Since B_ g, resp. A_ h, resp. A'_{h'} is equal to \mathcal{O}_ Y(D(g)), resp. f_*\mathcal{O}_ X(D(g)), resp. f'_*\mathcal{O}_{X'}(D(g)) the claim follows.
It remains to show that Y' is the pushout. The discussion above shows the scheme Y' has an affine open covering Y' = \bigcup W'_ i such that the corresponding opens U'_ i \subset X', W_ i \subset Y, and U_ i \subset X are affine open. Moreover, if A'_ i, B_ i, A_ i are the rings corresponding to U'_ i, W_ i, U_ i, then W'_ i corresponds to B_ i \times _{A_ i} A'_ i. Thus we can apply Lemmas 37.14.1 and 37.14.2 to conclude our construction is a pushout in the category of schemes.
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: