Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

98.11 Limit preserving

The morphism p : \mathcal{X} \to (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} is limit preserving on objects, as defined in Criteria for Representability, Section 97.5, if the functor of the definition below is essentially surjective. However, the example in Examples, Section 110.54 shows that this isn't equivalent to being limit preserving.

Definition 98.11.1. Let S be a scheme. Let \mathcal{X} be a category fibred in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. We say \mathcal{X} is limit preserving if for every affine scheme T over S which is a limit T = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits T_ i of a directed inverse system of affine schemes T_ i over S, we have an equivalence

\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathcal{X}_{T_ i} \longrightarrow \mathcal{X}_ T

of fibre categories.

We spell out what this means. First, given objects x, y of \mathcal{X} over T_ i we should have

\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathcal{X}_ T}(x|_ T, y|_ T) = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i' \geq i} \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\mathcal{X}_{T_{i'}}}(x|_{T_{i'}}, y|_{T_{i'}})

and second every object of \mathcal{X}_ T is isomorphic to the restriction of an object over T_ i for some i. Note that the first condition means that the presheaves \mathit{Isom}_\mathcal {X}(x, y) (see Stacks, Definition 8.2.2) are limit preserving.

Lemma 98.11.2. Let S be a scheme. Let p : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y} and q : \mathcal{Z} \to \mathcal{Y} be 1-morphisms of categories fibred in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}.

  1. If \mathcal{X} \to (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} and \mathcal{Z} \to (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} are limit preserving on objects and \mathcal{Y} is limit preserving, then \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} \mathcal{Z} \to (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} is limit preserving on objects.

  2. If \mathcal{X}, \mathcal{Y}, and \mathcal{Z} are limit preserving, then so is \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} \mathcal{Z}.

Proof. This is formal. Proof of (1). Let T = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{i \in I} T_ i be the directed limit of affine schemes T_ i over S. We will prove that the functor \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathcal{X}_{T_ i} \to \mathcal{X}_ T is essentially surjective. Recall that an object of the fibre product over T is a quadruple (T, x, z, \alpha ) where x is an object of \mathcal{X} lying over T, z is an object of \mathcal{Z} lying over T, and \alpha : p(x) \to q(z) is a morphism in the fibre category of \mathcal{Y} over T. By assumption on \mathcal{X} and \mathcal{Z} we can find an i and objects x_ i and z_ i over T_ i such that x_ i|_ T \cong T and z_ i|_ T \cong z. Then \alpha corresponds to an isomorphism p(x_ i)|_ T \to q(z_ i)|_ T which comes from an isomorphism \alpha _{i'} : p(x_ i)|_{T_{i'}} \to q(z_ i)|_{T_{i'}} by our assumption on \mathcal{Y}. After replacing i by i', x_ i by x_ i|_{T_{i'}}, and z_ i by z_ i|_{T_{i'}} we see that (T_ i, x_ i, z_ i, \alpha _ i) is an object of the fibre product over T_ i which restricts to an object isomorphic to (T, x, z, \alpha ) over T as desired.

We omit the arguments showing that \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathcal{X}_{T_ i} \to \mathcal{X}_ T is fully faithful in (2). \square

Lemma 98.11.3. Let S be a scheme. Let \mathcal{X} be an algebraic stack over S. Then the following are equivalent

  1. \mathcal{X} is a stack in setoids and \mathcal{X} \to (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} is limit preserving on objects,

  2. \mathcal{X} is a stack in setoids and limit preserving,

  3. \mathcal{X} is representable by an algebraic space locally of finite presentation.

Proof. Under each of the three assumptions \mathcal{X} is representable by an algebraic space X over S, see Algebraic Stacks, Proposition 94.13.3. It is clear that (1) and (2) are equivalent as a functor between setoids is an equivalence if and only if it is surjective on isomorphism classes. Finally, (1) and (3) are equivalent by Limits of Spaces, Proposition 70.3.10. \square

Lemma 98.11.4. Let S be a scheme. Let \mathcal{X} be a category fibred in groupoids over (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. Assume \Delta : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{X} \times \mathcal{X} is representable by algebraic spaces and \mathcal{X} is limit preserving. Then \Delta is locally of finite type.

Proof. We apply Criteria for Representability, Lemma 97.5.6. Let V be an affine scheme V locally of finite presentation over S and let \theta be an object of \mathcal{X} \times \mathcal{X} over V. Let F_\theta be an algebraic space representing \mathcal{X} \times _{\Delta , \mathcal{X} \times \mathcal{X}, \theta } (\mathit{Sch}/V)_{fppf} and let f_\theta : F_\theta \to V be the canonical morphism (see Algebraic Stacks, Section 94.9). It suffices to show that F_\theta \to V has the corresponding properties. By Lemmas 98.11.2 and 98.11.3 we see that F_\theta \to S is locally of finite presentation. It follows that F_\theta \to V is locally of finite type by Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.23.6. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #5348 by Will Chen on

After "We spell out what this means", I think the 's should be


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.