Lemma 32.13.1. Assumptions and notation as in Situation 32.8.1. If

$f$ is proper, and

$f_0$ is locally of finite type,

then there exists an $i$ such that $f_ i$ is proper.

** If the base change of a scheme to a limit is proper, then already the base change is proper at a finite level. **

Lemma 32.13.1. Assumptions and notation as in Situation 32.8.1. If

$f$ is proper, and

$f_0$ is locally of finite type,

then there exists an $i$ such that $f_ i$ is proper.

**Proof.**
By Lemma 32.8.6 we see that $f_ i$ is separated for some $i \geq 0$. Replacing $0$ by $i$ we may assume that $f_0$ is separated. Observe that $f_0$ is quasi-compact, see Schemes, Lemma 26.21.14. By Lemma 32.12.1 we can choose a diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ X_0 \ar[rd] & X_0' \ar[d] \ar[l]^\pi \ar[r] & \mathbf{P}^ n_{Y_0} \ar[dl] \\ & Y_0 & } \]

where $X_0' \to \mathbf{P}^ n_{Y_0}$ is an immersion, and $\pi : X_0' \to X_0$ is proper and surjective. Introduce $X' = X_0' \times _{Y_0} Y$ and $X_ i' = X_0' \times _{Y_0} Y_ i$. By Morphisms, Lemmas 29.41.4 and 29.41.5 we see that $X' \to Y$ is proper. Hence $X' \to \mathbf{P}^ n_ Y$ is a closed immersion (Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.7). By Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.9 it suffices to prove that $X'_ i \to Y_ i$ is proper for some $i$. By Lemma 32.8.5 we find that $X'_ i \to \mathbf{P}^ n_{Y_ i}$ is a closed immersion for $i$ large enough. Then $X'_ i \to Y_ i$ is proper and we win. $\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (1)

Comment #896 by Kestutis Cesnavicius on