Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 20.47.2. Let (X, \mathcal{O}_ X) be a ringed space. Let E be an object of D(\mathcal{O}_ X).

  1. If there exists an open covering X = \bigcup U_ i, strictly perfect complexes \mathcal{E}_ i^\bullet on U_ i, and maps \alpha _ i : \mathcal{E}_ i^\bullet \to E|_{U_ i} in D(\mathcal{O}_{U_ i}) with H^ j(\alpha _ i) an isomorphism for j > m and H^ m(\alpha _ i) surjective, then E is m-pseudo-coherent.

  2. If E is m-pseudo-coherent, then any complex representing E is m-pseudo-coherent.

Proof. Let \mathcal{F}^\bullet be any complex representing E and let X = \bigcup U_ i and \alpha _ i : \mathcal{E}_ i^\bullet \to E|_{U_ i} be as in (1). We will show that \mathcal{F}^\bullet is m-pseudo-coherent as a complex, which will prove (1) and (2) simultaneously. By Lemma 20.46.8 we can after refining the open covering X = \bigcup U_ i represent the maps \alpha _ i by maps of complexes \alpha _ i : \mathcal{E}_ i^\bullet \to \mathcal{F}^\bullet |_{U_ i}. By assumption H^ j(\alpha _ i) are isomorphisms for j > m, and H^ m(\alpha _ i) is surjective whence \mathcal{F}^\bullet is m-pseudo-coherent. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #2770 by on

There is a typo in the first line of the proof. It should be ( is missing on ).


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.