Lemma 21.46.3. Let (\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O}) be a ringed site. Let E be an object of D(\mathcal{O}). Let a, b \in \mathbf{Z} with a \leq b. The following are equivalent
E has tor-amplitude in [a, b].
E is represented by a complex \mathcal{E}^\bullet of flat \mathcal{O}-modules with \mathcal{E}^ i = 0 for i \not\in [a, b].
Proof.
If (2) holds, then we may compute E \otimes _\mathcal {O}^\mathbf {L} \mathcal{F} = \mathcal{E}^\bullet \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathcal{F} and it is clear that (1) holds.
Assume that (1) holds. We may represent E by a bounded above complex of flat \mathcal{O}-modules \mathcal{K}^\bullet , see Section 21.17. Let n be the largest integer such that \mathcal{K}^ n \not= 0. If n > b, then \mathcal{K}^{n - 1} \to \mathcal{K}^ n is surjective as H^ n(\mathcal{K}^\bullet ) = 0. As \mathcal{K}^ n is flat we see that \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\mathcal{K}^{n - 1} \to \mathcal{K}^ n) is flat (Modules on Sites, Lemma 18.28.10). Hence we may replace \mathcal{K}^\bullet by \tau _{\leq n - 1}\mathcal{K}^\bullet . Thus, by induction on n, we reduce to the case that K^\bullet is a complex of flat \mathcal{O}-modules with \mathcal{K}^ i = 0 for i > b.
Set \mathcal{E}^\bullet = \tau _{\geq a}\mathcal{K}^\bullet . Everything is clear except that \mathcal{E}^ a is flat which follows immediately from Lemma 21.46.2 and the definitions.
\square
Comments (0)