The Stacks project

Lemma 75.13.3. Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $E$ be an object of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. Then

  1. $E$ has tor amplitude in $[a, b]$ if and only if $\epsilon ^*E$ has tor amplitude in $[a, b]$.

  2. $E$ has finite tor dimension if and only if $\epsilon ^*E$ has finite tor dimension.

Here $\epsilon $ is as in (

Proof. The easy implication follows from Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.46.5. For the converse, assume that $\epsilon ^*E$ has tor amplitude in $[a, b]$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be an $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. As $\epsilon $ is a flat morphism of ringed sites (Lemma 75.4.1) we have

\[ \epsilon ^*(E \otimes ^\mathbf {L}_{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{F}) = \epsilon ^*E \otimes ^\mathbf {L}_{\mathcal{O}_{\acute{e}tale}} \epsilon ^*\mathcal{F} \]

Thus the (assumed) vanishing of cohomology sheaves on the right hand side implies the desired vanishing of the cohomology sheaves of $E \otimes ^\mathbf {L}_{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{F}$ via Lemma 75.4.1. $\square$

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 08HF. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.