Lemma 69.12.3. Assumptions and notation as in Situation 69.6.1. Let $\mathcal{F}_0$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_{X_0}$-module. Denote $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{F}_ i$ the pullbacks of $\mathcal{F}_0$ to $X$ and $X_ i$. Assume

1. $f_0$ is locally of finite type,

2. $\mathcal{F}_0$ is of finite type,

3. the scheme theoretic support of $\mathcal{F}$ is proper over $Y$.

Then the scheme theoretic support of $\mathcal{F}_ i$ is proper over $Y_ i$ for some $i$.

Proof. We may replace $X_0$ by the scheme theoretic support of $\mathcal{F}_0$. By Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 66.15.2 this guarantees that $X_ i$ is the support of $\mathcal{F}_ i$ and $X$ is the support of $\mathcal{F}$. Then, if $Z \subset X$ denotes the scheme theoretic support of $\mathcal{F}$, we see that $Z \to X$ is a universal homeomorphism. We conclude that $X \to Y$ is proper as this is true for $Z \to Y$ by assumption, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.9. By Lemma 69.6.13 we see that $X_ i \to Y$ is proper for some $i$. Then it follows that the scheme theoretic support $Z_ i$ of $\mathcal{F}_ i$ is proper over $Y$ by Morphisms of Spaces, Lemmas 66.40.5 and 66.40.4. $\square$

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).