The Stacks project

91.14 The cotangent complex of a local complete intersection

If $A \to B$ is a local complete intersection map, then $L_{B/A}$ is a perfect complex. The key to proving this is the following lemma.

Lemma 91.14.1. Let $A = \mathbf{Z}[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \to B = \mathbf{Z}$ be the ring map which sends $x_ i$ to $0$ for $i = 1, \ldots , n$. Let $I = (x_1, \ldots , x_ n) \subset A$. Then $L_{B/A}$ is quasi-isomorphic to $I/I^2[1]$.

Proof. There are several ways to prove this. For example one can explicitly construct a resolution of $B$ over $A$ and compute. We will use ( Namely, consider the distinguished triangle

\[ L_{\mathbf{Z}[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/\mathbf{Z}} \otimes _{\mathbf{Z}[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]} \mathbf{Z} \to L_{\mathbf{Z}/\mathbf{Z}} \to L_{\mathbf{Z}/\mathbf{Z}[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]}\to L_{\mathbf{Z}[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/\mathbf{Z}} \otimes _{\mathbf{Z}[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]} \mathbf{Z}[1] \]

The complex $L_{\mathbf{Z}[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/\mathbf{Z}}$ is quasi-isomorphic to $\Omega _{\mathbf{Z}[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/\mathbf{Z}}$ by Lemma 91.4.7. The complex $L_{\mathbf{Z}/\mathbf{Z}}$ is zero in $D(\mathbf{Z})$ by Lemma 91.8.4. Thus we see that $L_{B/A}$ has only one nonzero cohomology group which is as described in the lemma by Lemma 91.11.2. $\square$

Lemma 91.14.2. Let $A \to B$ be a surjective ring map whose kernel $I$ is generated by a Koszul-regular sequence (for example a regular sequence). Then $L_{B/A}$ is quasi-isomorphic to $I/I^2[1]$.

Proof. Let $f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in I$ be a Koszul regular sequence generating $I$. Consider the ring map $\mathbf{Z}[x_1, \ldots , x_ r] \to A$ sending $x_ i$ to $f_ i$. Since $x_1, \ldots , x_ r$ is a regular sequence in $\mathbf{Z}[x_1, \ldots , x_ r]$ we see that the Koszul complex on $x_1, \ldots , x_ r$ is a free resolution of $\mathbf{Z} = \mathbf{Z}[x_1, \ldots , x_ r]/(x_1, \ldots , x_ r)$ over $\mathbf{Z}[x_1, \ldots , x_ r]$ (see More on Algebra, Lemma 15.30.2). Thus the assumption that $f_1, \ldots , f_ r$ is Koszul regular exactly means that $B = A \otimes _{\mathbf{Z}[x_1, \ldots , x_ r]}^\mathbf {L} \mathbf{Z}$. Hence $L_{B/A} = L_{\mathbf{Z}/\mathbf{Z}[x_1, \ldots , x_ r]} \otimes _\mathbf {Z}^\mathbf {L} B$ by Lemmas 91.6.2 and 91.14.1. $\square$

Lemma 91.14.3. Let $A \to B$ be a surjective ring map whose kernel $I$ is Koszul. Then $L_{B/A}$ is quasi-isomorphic to $I/I^2[1]$.

Proof. Locally on $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ the ideal $I$ is generated by a Koszul regular sequence, see More on Algebra, Definition 15.32.1. Hence this follows from Lemma 91.6.2. $\square$

Proposition 91.14.4. Let $A \to B$ be a local complete intersection map. Then $L_{B/A}$ is a perfect complex with tor amplitude in $[-1, 0]$.

Proof. Choose a surjection $P = A[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \to B$ with kernel $J$. By Lemma 91.11.3 we see that $J/J^2 \to \bigoplus B\text{d}x_ i$ is quasi-isomorphic to $\tau _{\geq -1}L_{B/A}$. Note that $J/J^2$ is finite projective (More on Algebra, Lemma 15.32.3), hence $\tau _{\geq -1}L_{B/A}$ is a perfect complex with tor amplitude in $[-1, 0]$. Thus it suffices to show that $H^ i(L_{B/A}) = 0$ for $i \not\in [-1, 0]$. This follows from (

\[ L_{P/A} \otimes _ P^\mathbf {L} B \to L_{B/A} \to L_{B/P} \to L_{P/A} \otimes _ P^\mathbf {L} B[1] \]

and Lemma 91.14.3 to see that $H^ i(L_{B/P})$ is zero unless $i \in \{ -1, 0\} $. (We also use Lemma 91.4.7 for the term on the left.) $\square$

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 08SH. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.