Lemma 61.2.1. Let X be a spectral space. Let X_0 \subset X be the set of closed points. The following are equivalent
Every open covering of X can be refined by a finite disjoint union decomposition X = \coprod U_ i with U_ i open and closed in X.
The composition X_0 \to X \to \pi _0(X) is bijective.
Moreover, if X_0 is closed in X and every point of X specializes to a unique point of X_0, then these conditions are satisfied.
Proof.
We will use without further mention that X_0 is quasi-compact (Topology, Lemma 5.12.9) and \pi _0(X) is profinite (Topology, Lemma 5.23.9). Picture
\xymatrix{ X_0 \ar[rd]_ f \ar[r] & X \ar[d]^\pi \\ & \pi _0(X) }
If (2) holds, the continuous bijective map f : X_0 \to \pi _0(X) is a homeomorphism by Topology, Lemma 5.17.8. Given an open covering X = \bigcup U_ i, we get an open covering \pi _0(X) = \bigcup f(X_0 \cap U_ i). By Topology, Lemma 5.22.4 we can find a finite open covering of the form \pi _0(X) = \coprod V_ j which refines this covering. Since X_0 \to \pi _0(X) is bijective each connected component of X has a unique closed point, whence is equal to the set of points specializing to this closed point. Hence \pi ^{-1}(V_ j) is the set of points specializing to the points of f^{-1}(V_ j). Now, if f^{-1}(V_ j) \subset X_0 \cap U_ i \subset U_ i, then it follows that \pi ^{-1}(V_ j) \subset U_ i (because the open set U_ i is closed under generalizations). In this way we see that the open covering X = \coprod \pi ^{-1}(V_ j) refines the covering we started out with. In this way we see that (2) implies (1).
Assume (1). Let x, y \in X be closed points. Then we have the open covering X = (X \setminus \{ x\} ) \cup (X \setminus \{ y\} ). It follows from (1) that there exists a disjoint union decomposition X = U \amalg V with U and V open (and closed) and x \in U and y \in V. In particular we see that every connected component of X has at most one closed point. By Topology, Lemma 5.12.8 every connected component (being closed) also does have a closed point. Thus X_0 \to \pi _0(X) is bijective. In this way we see that (1) implies (2).
Assume X_0 is closed in X and every point specializes to a unique point of X_0. Then X_0 is a spectral space (Topology, Lemma 5.23.5) consisting of closed points, hence profinite (Topology, Lemma 5.23.8). Let x, y \in X_0 be distinct. By Topology, Lemma 5.22.4 we can find a disjoint union decomposition X_0 = U_0 \amalg V_0 with U_0 and V_0 open and closed and x \in U_0 and y \in V_0. Let U \subset X, resp. V \subset X be the set of points specializing to U_0, resp. V_0. Observe that X = U \amalg V. By Topology, Lemma 5.24.7 we see that U is an intersection of quasi-compact open subsets. Hence U is closed in the constructible topology. Since U is closed under specialization, we see that U is closed by Topology, Lemma 5.23.6. By symmetry V is closed and hence U and V are both open and closed. This proves that x, y are not in the same connected component of X. In other words, X_0 \to \pi _0(X) is injective. The map is also surjective by Topology, Lemma 5.12.8 and the fact that connected components are closed. In this way we see that the final condition implies (2).
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: